What FPS do you get playing Squad with your rig?

[MrOcto]

On 1/9/2018 at 10:59 AM, Van Darkholme said:

I capped my FPS to 60 FPS (I use a Dell U2711), I'm likely getting somewhere in the 70-100 range, never noticed anything below 60, at least.

 

Playing on Ultra/Epic at 2560x1440, no super-sampling or pre-loading all textures.

 

Intel i5-760 OC'd to 4GHz (on a stock cooler, and running at great temps!)

Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UDH5

G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) DDR3 1600MHz 

250GB Samsung Evo 850 SSD

Gigabyte GTX 1080ti Gaming OC 11G

 

The 1080ti is truly a beast of a card, I got it from a friend at a (very) low price. Prior to that, I had a GTX 470 and then was gifted a GTX 660, and could only play Squad on minimum settings at 1280x720. In terms of raw FPS, my CPU is likely bottle-necking the card a bit (although from similar builds, it's not too bad), however seeing as my monitor is really the ultimate bottleneck, it doesn't really matter to me.

My friend, it's impossible you're using a i5 760 with that board.

[Faerio]

VideoCard : RX560 4gb OC;
RAM : Kingston 4DDR 8GB 2133;
Processor: AMD Athlon x4 950;
1360x768: 45FPS on Shooting range(changing graphic settings doesn't change anything);

 

[Sheeson]

FPS: 27
CPU: FX-6300
GPU: GTX 1060 3GB
RAM: 8GB RipJaws 2 x 4GB DDR3
Res: 1920x1080
Settings: Epic (or low, doesn't change anything)

Please improve the performance on AMD processors.

[Krille]

FPS, 50-70 on lowest, 40-60 fps with some stuff on medium to at least make the game look better then bf2.
1920x1080

Computer
Xfx 7950, 1040mhz core clock and 1320mhz memory clock.
I7 6700k, 4.5 ghz
16gig ram
500gb ssd

How gpu intense is squad? I feel like i should get more fps and be able to play on medium settings with no problems with acceptable fps. The only thing that sucks in my computer is my gpu, im waiting for prices to be reasonable again before upgrading. When are they going to focus on optimization? I feel like they should start to consider optimizing squad so more people can play it.

Edit: Since  V11 my FPS has increased significantly and its very playable on mid settings now with fps from 50 in cities to 80 in less urban areas. Still waiting eagerly to buy a new gpu en see how well my system will handle Squad then 

Edited May 10 by Krille

[CoyoteJohn]

FPS: 30ish on average

GPU: GTX 1080 8GB

CPU: AMD FX-8320

RAM: 16GB

 

Game runs horrendously in MP. At least once per match I get a 10-20 second lag spike.

[Thegreenzzz]

1 hour ago, CoyoteJohn said:

FPS: 30ish on average

GPU: GTX 1080 8GB

CPU: AMD FX-8320

RAM: 16GB

 

Game runs horrendously in MP. At least once per match I get a 10-20 second lag spike.

i have a 1050 ti and i get a like 30-60 depending on map!

[STEiFAN]

Generally running around 60 FPS online since 0,10 with my old 2013 computer with 2017 "high-end budget" GPU.

 

Settings:

1920x1080 on 60Hz screen

Anti-aliasing: T-FXAA

Super sampling: 1,5x

Effects: Low

View Distance: Epic

Foliage: Medium

Shadows: Medium

Bloom: check

Eye adaption: check

 

GPU: Asus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Strix Gaming OC HDMI DP 4GB (overclocked core to 1638Mhz & to 7900 MHz on the VRAM)

CPU: Intel Core i5 3350p, 3,1GHz

RAM: 16GB DDR3, dual channel

 

 

 

[[email protected]]

60 - 80 FPS on average, occasional drop below

 

Settings:

1920x1080 on 60Hz screen

Anti-aliasing: T-FXAA

Super sampling: 1.25x

Effects: Epic

View Distance: Epic

Foliage: Epic

Shadows: High

Bloom: Yes

Eye adaption: Yes

 

Laptop

CPU: i7-8700

GPU: Nvidia GTX1060 6gb

RAM: 16GB DDR4 

HDD: 500gb SDD

 

 

 

 

Edited June 17 by [email protected]

[Chew_Kok_Long]

FPS: Minimum 50 (rare drops and only in crowded areas looking towards enemy team), mostly 70-120.

120+ in mainbase at round start/empty server.

 

 

Settings:

2560x1440 on 144Hz screen

LOW PRESET APPLIED, then changed settings:

Anti-aliasing: T-FXAA

Super sampling: 0x

Effects: Low (has the biggest fps hit for me)

View Distance: Epic

Foliage: Medium

Shadows: High

Ambient Occlusion: Yes

Bloom: No

Eye adaption: No

Gamma: 2.00

Screen sharpening: 1.00

 

Imho this makes the game look awesome while you still keep your frames. For me the trick is to apply the low preset first (if you play in 1080p or have a better gpu than 970 you can well also use medium) to get rid of post processing effects which cannot be disabled seperately.

 

 

CPU: i5-6600k

GPU: Nvidia GTX970

RAM: 8GB DDR4 

HDD: 250gb SsD

 

 

 

Edited June 22 by Chew_Kok_Long

[Shaldag]

I 5 8400,  16gigs ddr 4 3200, GTX 1060 6 gigs, 500 Crucial mx 300 ssd

 

FPS between 85 95

 

Settings:

1920x1080

Custom PRESET APPLIED, then changed settings:

Anti-aliasing: none

Super sampling: 0x

Effects: med

View Distance: med

Foliage: Medium

Shadows: low

Ambient Occlusion: no

Bloom: No

Eye adaption: No

Gamma: 2.50

Screen sharpening: o.50

[doomis]

On 6/23/2018 at 1:24 AM, Chew_Kok_Long said:

FPS: Minimum 50 (rare drops and only in crowded areas looking towards enemy team), mostly 70-120.

120+ in mainbase at round start/empty server.

 

 

Settings:

2560x1440 on 144Hz screen

LOW PRESET APPLIED, then changed settings:

Anti-aliasing: T-FXAA

Super sampling: 0x

Effects: Low (has the biggest fps hit for me)

View Distance: Epic

Foliage: Medium

Shadows: High

Ambient Occlusion: Yes

Bloom: No

Eye adaption: No

Gamma: 2.00

Screen sharpening: 1.00

 

Imho this makes the game look awesome while you still keep your frames. For me the trick is to apply the low preset first (if you play in 1080p or have a better gpu than 970 you can well also use medium) to get rid of post processing effects which cannot be disabled seperately.

 

 

CPU: i5-6600k

GPU: Nvidia GTX970

RAM: 8GB DDR4 

HDD: 250gb SsD

 

 

 

Interesting trick on the presets. What monitor do you use? Posted a new thread about upgrading to a 2k 144hz monitor on a gtx1070 right before seeing your post

 

Your fps seems better than what I get on a slightly newer rig... will try the presets as soon as possible! I would wish for higher effects though (explosions are amazing in this game) as well as high foliage over shadows.

Edited July 1 by doomis

[Chew_Kok_Long]

I have a Dell S2716DG and i love it. The 970 really lacks power for it sadly but 1070 would be 10/10. Ima wait for the next batch of Nvidia GPUs before i upgrade, really need to skip one generation at least.

 

Effects is what really eats fps though, you should go on the shooting range and see the effects difference. On explosions for example it doesnt look bad at all if you keep it on medium.

 

Also, fps dropped by around 15-20 with last patch. Even on shooting range now i mostly have 65-105.

Edited July 1 by Chew_Kok_Long

[wesuperstar]

On 23.6.2018 at 12:24 AM, Chew_Kok_Long said:

Settings:

2560x1440 on 144Hz screen

LOW PRESET APPLIED, then changed settings:

Anti-aliasing: T-FXAA

AA isn´t working, if you choose LOW preset. You have to go with medium or higher presets

[SHO-SHIN]

33 minutes ago, wesuperstar said:

AA isn´t working, if you choose LOW preset. You have to go with medium or higher presets

I use T-FXAA and it reduces the glare/flicker.

best tested in the range on the fence that runs up the side.

[Chew_Kok_Long]

On 11.7.2018 at 7:20 AM, wesuperstar said:

AA isn´t working, if you choose LOW preset. You have to go with medium or higher presets

No, that has been fixed. Even though medium preset will still do for a lot of people and looks quite a bit nicer.

Edited July 12 by Chew_Kok_Long

[aCeTotal]

70 - 150 FPS (Epic settings, Super sampling 1.25 & Ambient Occlusion - OFF )

- ASUS ROG Strix Z270E
- Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4,2Ghz
- ASUS GeForce GTX 1080Ti ROG Strix
- Corsair Veng. LED DDR4 3200MHz 32GB
- AOC 35" AGON Curved LED G-Sync 3440x1440, 100Hz
- Windows 10 x64



 

[brofist4u]

specs i5 8400 16gb DDR4 2400mhz C15 RAM GTX 1070ti 600mhz memory overclock with 100 mhz core over clock

1440p

shadows medium

effects high

foliage low

view distance epic

bloom on

lens flare on

motion blur on

TAA on

fps Out doors running around 80-70 fps

looking at the sky 120-140fps

in APC and shooting other APCs/cars 50-65 fps

in APC just driving 70-65 fps

firefight with a lot of people 70-75 fps

minimal fps is 50 and that only happens in APCs

minimal fps outdoors and fighting is 65fps while being in smoke and grenades flying everywhere and Automatic Rifle men shooting all around you everywhere and sometimes hitting you

On 2018/7/1 at 11:44 PM, Chew_Kok_Long said:

I have a Dell S2716DG and i love it. The 970 really lacks power for it sadly but 1070 would be 10/10. Ima wait for the next batch of Nvidia GPUs before i upgrade, really need to skip one generation at least.

 

Effects is what really eats fps though, you should go on the shooting range and see the effects difference. On explosions for example it doesnt look bad at all if you keep it on medium.

 

Also, fps dropped by around 15-20 with last patch. Even on shooting range now i mostly have 65-105.

would recommend going for a gtx 1080ti when prices drop also get a 800w psu for it while you are waiting (buy it when it is 550$ or lower)

[Chew_Kok_Long]

On 25.8.2018 at 6:37 PM, brofist4u said:

specs i5 8400 16gb DDR4 2400mhz C15 RAM GTX 1070ti 600mhz memory overclock with 100 mhz core over clock

1440p

shadows medium

effects high

foliage low

view distance epic

bloom on

lens flare on

motion blur on

TAA on

fps Out doors running around 80-70 fps

looking at the sky 120-140fps

in APC and shooting other APCs/cars 50-65 fps

in APC just driving 70-65 fps

firefight with a lot of people 70-75 fps

minimal fps is 50 and that only happens in APCs

minimal fps outdoors and fighting is 65fps while being in smoke and grenades flying everywhere and Automatic Rifle men shooting all around you everywhere and sometimes hitting you

would recommend going for a gtx 1080ti when prices drop also get a 800w psu for it while you are waiting (buy it when it is 550$ or lower)

I have a 750w psu which is an absolute overkill and will buy the 2080

Edited August 26 by Chew_Kok_Long

[Psyrus]

===========================================

v9.9 

===========================================

Kokan 78/78

Frames: 56642

Time (ms): 560094

Min: 56

Max: 136

Avg: 101.129

 

Al Basrah 72-76/78

Frames: 62031

Time (ms): 741454

Min: 58

Max: 105

Avg: 83.661

 

 

===========================================

v12 
===========================================

Al Basrah 78/78

Frames: 19223

Time (ms): 300000

Min: 1

Max: 84

Avg: 64.077

 

Fools Road 78/78

Frames: 19576

Time (ms): 300000

Min: 43

Max: 80

Avg: 65.253

 

Kohat Toi (1) 78/78

Frames: 17677

Time (ms): 300000

Min: 46

Max: 118

Avg: 58.923

 

Kohat Toi (2) 76/78

Frames: 21008

Time (ms): 300000

Min: 47

Max: 105

Avg: 70.027

 

Belaya (1) 80/80

Frames: 24068

Time (ms): 300000

Min: 46

Max: 113

Avg: 80.227

 

Belaya (2) 80/80

Frames: 21679

Time (ms): 300000

Min: 47

Max: 103

Avg: 72.263

[fatalsushi]

@Psyrus thanks! At what resolution and level of detail do you play?

[Psyrus]

5 hours ago, fatalsushi said:

@Psyrus thanks! At what resolution and level of detail do you play?

1920x1080

Everything maxed out but no AA nor resolution scaling. 

 

Blur and bloom turned off 

[Erdogan GoatDictator]

How can players play without AA and without super-sampling.
That is a hazy bunch.
I have a gtx 970 and a 6600K.
Everything is at its highest with TXAA and at least 1.25 super-sampling.
You need that at least for a nice experience.

Strange that there are many with much better computers, this can not run.
Probably they made the mistake of having a too high resolution screen, which is totally unnecessary.

1920x1080 24 inches is perfect for games and work..

vsync on
60fps
6600K 4600mhz
RAM 16GB
GTX 970 1500MHZ

 

Do not buy AMD, junk!

 

 

 

 

Edited November 27 by Erdogan GoatDictator

[Deathracker]

FPS 40
CPU Fx-6300
RAM 12GbB