Jump to content
MilosV

What do you currently dislike about Squad and how would you change it?

Recommended Posts

I really really want weapon resting.

I think it'd help round out infantry combat.

And maybe open/closeable/destructable doors.

Wald

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The game often dissolves into a meatgrinder, resembling more the trench warfare of WW1 than depicting a modern conflict. The spawning is one of the culprits behind it. The unlimited Rally Points ensure that a firefight can drag on forever. FOBs on objectives is like a never ending wasp nest that takes ages to get rid of. The flow of the game is honestly horrid.

One way to fix this would be to have spawning (outside of main) cost ammo points. The wasp nest FOBs would eventually die if they can't resuply it. Limit the Rally Points, let SLs carry one RP at a time, but have the ability to resuply a new RP at FOBs and vehicles (since they now carry ammo points).

I think this would make a match have its ups and downs, move back and fourth, instead of the meatgrinder at one location for the whole duration of the match.

I know the devs are looking into the spawning mechanics and I have faith that they will deliver a satisfying end product, but in its current form (and due to me having played it a lot), I find Squad somewhat unplayable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Gaius Marius said:

The game often dissolves into a meatgrinder, resembling more the trench warfare of WW1 than depicting a modern conflict. The spawning is one of the culprits behind it. The unlimited Rally Points ensure that a firefight can drag on forever. FOBs on objectives is like a never ending wasp nest that takes ages to get rid of. The flow of the game is honestly horrid.

One way to fix this would be to have spawning (outside of main) cost ammo points. The wasp nest FOBs would eventually die if they can't resuply it. Limit the Rally Points, let SLs carry one RP at a time, but have the ability to resuply a new RP at FOBs and vehicles (since they now carry ammo points).

I think this would make a match have its ups and downs, move back and fourth, instead of the meatgrinder at one location for the whole duration of the match.

I know the devs are looking into the spawning mechanics and I have faith that they will deliver a satisfying end product, but in its current form (and due to me having played it a lot), I find Squad somewhat unplayable.

 

Good idea, but unrealistic due to the sorry state of the playerbase. People can't even handle Conquest or Insurgency game modes, and you expect them to keep moving along with fluid spawns? What will actually happen is that two-thirds of the squads will be wandering around at irrelevant locations and the rest will be constantly running APCs from Main to the contended flag, then abandoning them in the field

I agree that the mechanics could do with some tweaking, but the changes have to be completely idiot-proof. It's very easy to do more harm than good, and looks like the devs understand this very well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, Gopblin said:

 

Good idea, but unrealistic due to the sorry state of the playerbase. People can't even handle Conquest or Insurgency game modes, and you expect them to keep moving along with fluid spawns? What will actually happen is that two-thirds of the squads will be wandering around at irrelevant locations and the rest will be constantly running APCs from Main to the contended flag, then abandoning them in the field

I agree that the mechanics could do with some tweaking, but the changes have to be completely idiot-proof. It's very easy to do more harm than good, and looks like the devs understand this very well.



Conquest is played a lot lately. Insurgency isn't because it's an even bigger meatgrinder due to the fact there's no wait time for spawning on caches and there's always a base close where you can get supplies as INS, which leads to superfobbing the cache compounds and having to bruteforce your way in.

What you're saying would happen is demonstrably false. APCs work fine now and for the most part aren't abandoned, yet you somehow arrive at the conclusion that if they were made more valuable as transport then that would change. Even though, if you look at how often they were being abandoned before FOBs were fixed - timer going up with enemies close - the reverse is true.

Also having 3 squads lost and wandering the map on foot not having fun is a good thing, not harm. As far as it makes them learn or drop the game.
The only harm that can be done is to the current playerbase, not potential playerbase.

So, since I've already shown you how your point is wrong, there's only two ways I can look at this. Either you consider yourself the one that would wander about the map on foot or waste assets, in which case you don't want that changed, because you would have to adapt to it   or   you are trying to speak for someone else. Which is it?

Edited by Peerun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Peerun said:



Conquest is played a lot lately. Insurgency isn't because it's an even bigger meatgrinder due to the fact there's no wait time for spawning on caches and there's always a base close where you can get supplies as INS, which leads to superfobbing the cache compounds and having to bruteforce your way in.

What you're saying would happen is demonstrably false. APCs work fine now and for the most part aren't abandoned, yet you somehow arrive at the conclusion that if they were made more valuable as transport then that would change. Even though, if you look at how often they were being abandoned before FOBs were fixed - timer going up with enemies close - the reverse is true.

Also having 3 squads lost and wandering the map on foot not having fun is a good thing, not harm. As far as it makes them learn or drop the game.
The only harm that can be done is to the current playerbase, not potential playerbase.

So, since I've already shown you how your point is wrong, there's only two ways I can look at this. Either you consider yourself the one that would wander about the map on foot or waste assets, in which case you don't want that changed, because you would have to adapt to it   or   you are trying to speak for someone else. Which is it?

 

1. Really? Go in the server browser and check the percentage of populated servers that are running Conquest maps. How high is it? 5%? 3%? Less? Does that count as "a lot" in your book?

2. Insurgency mode requires attackers to actually play objectives and move around. It's the same gameplay you want, except way less demanding. And at least half the time, they fail to do it, which is why the game mode isn't popular. Heck, pretty often the INS fail to spawn and defend the newly created cache because they're all crowded on the other one.
This, and the lack of popularity of Conquest, shows that "mobile" gameplay you want will not work with the current playerbase

3. The idea of making the game even less accessible to weed out the newbies might have some merit from a player's standpoint, but it definitely won't make sense to the devs.
Their goal isn't to cater to the hardcore playerbase, but to make a game that a large audience can enjoy. If you want something tailored to a tight community of hardcore players, go play a mod... or pay the dev's salaries yourself for the next 3 years while they make the game for you. Sorry, but that's capitalism. 

4. As to your question - see above. I'm just as frustrated as you by the ineptitude of a large chunk of the playerbase, but I understand that any suggested changes to the meta must take that into account. Otherwise Squad will probably die within the year because new ppl won't buy the game. Maybe if Squad also adds tools that help new players learn the game better (such as much better tutorials, or a  Friends/"communicate outside of of matches"/"join-server-together" system that it so desperately needs), then severely limiting spawn options would be more feasible

Edited by Gopblin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Gopblin said:

...


You're only using the worst examples. If one out of ten games I play now is Conquest, then it's played a lot more than when it was one out of a hundred.
I really don't see what your problem is with the sentiment. 
FOBs have been "fixed", but I still find myself camping HABs.
Ammo resupply from vehicles has been added, but I still find it's more effective to throw more barrels on a point from a rally point. Statistics win in Squad, exactly because of, as you say "inept playerbase", but current spawn system only contributes to that.
You can't expect the game to be more easy to understand, if you introduce more abstractions.
By changing the spawn meta you cull the playerbase based on mentality not ability.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess I could also use some examples

In other words, jumping into a vehicle to get to the fight is not abstract.
Having to keep enemies a certain distance away from an FOB to avoid a bigger spawn timer is an abstraction.
Clearing entrenched enemy positions is common sense.
Having a person sit inside a bunker, while another digs it down is the most contrived, gamey mechanic you could imagine and something that you have to learn and which isn't instantly obvious to be the most efficient thing.

Once you've learned it and someone cries "spawn camping" you're liable to laugh at that. But when you actually think about it, that sentence, although infused with salt makes a lot of sense.
What is the purpose of spawning on a HAB and being killed? Exactly, that's why you don't generally spawn on a camped HAB, right? Why allow it at all then?
There's instances where you spawn in, kill the camper and clear the area. Why is that a thing? A player spawning in thin air, inside a hesco bunker, killing a player who's there waiting for him? Doesn't really make any kind of sense, as per gameplay, without the context of, well the context of whatever.
In fact, the rest of the game mechanics being moderately sane, you wouldn't expect that to be a thing.
Yet it is, and there's a whole lot of other things that don't make a speck of sense.

But that's why the game is in Alpha.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I know the game isn't about other parts of the world where there is no conflict.

 

But I make me sad to never see these places, I really would like to see more greener maps. All that grey kills me.

 

Reason why post scriptum is so attractive. Feels like home.

Edited by Bonnie Money

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IRL if you wanted to deny the enemy a base and it's reinforcements, you'd surround it, deny resupply, then kill or capture who is left. The same should happen in game, starving it's outside resupply should deplete it of respawns, or close proximity should instantly stop respawns. Spawn killing should be impossible unless you are at range. I also hate the mini game of digging HABs while people respawn. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

I dislike:

 

-The fact that you can shoot someone in the chest twice, and the forearm once, and they are still able to accurately return fire and kill you because they have good reflexes. Really realistic out of 10.

 

-The shooting/movement mechanics are actually pretty bad imo. You can bunny hop out of situations where you are being engaged at medium to long range. You can zigzag in shootouts or escape a shootout like a crackhead with no penalty to speed or movement. Strafing left and right in shootouts is highly cancerous and unrealistic... switching strafing directions needs a massive movement penalty because of this.

 

-The suppression mechanic is broken, as in it is almost entirely ineffective against experienced players... can't tell you how many times I've gone full auto with a deployed mg, just to have the guy snapshot me while 30+ rounds are flying a foot over his head.

 

-Going prone after running has unrealistic amounts of sway... IRL you can almost immediately 100% stabilize a rifle after going prone, regardless of how fatigued you are or.

 

-Rifles have no real bullet-spread and are too accurate. Being able to one-shot plink someone in the face from 300m+ with an ak-74/47 is highly unrealistic. IRL you'd be banking on a dice roll to even touch the entire upper body of someone with an ak, firing military grade ammo from that range, even with optics.

Edited by stickNmove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×