Deadduck

Locked squads Good Idea or bad idea?

Squad locking    340 members have voted

  1. 1. Locked squads will be good for the game

    • Yes
      234
    • No
      101
    • I am going to comment anyway!
      10

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.
363 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

why ?

 

we do it at least and we never kick out people.

even if they joined while squad name was  "do not join".  

 

but it is a fact that it adds additional stress if you must switch between voice activation and push to talk in the game.

and additional to that, sometimes you must switch from your mother tongue and a foreign language (in my case english obviously) because some members of your squad cant understand the foreign language. 

 

squad leading can be really stressful in the heat of the game. especially if half of your squad is relativ new to the game.

a close function would had made it easier for me. i cant explain how badly i wished a close function in the last weeks.

 

particularly at the free weekend xD

 

and the election results says that a majority want a close function also. maybe because of other reasons, but yeah :

  • Yes  218
  • No  99
Edited by desen
putting in the vote results

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't even count how many people got mad at me since the start of Squad because I kicked them out for reasons of: 
- wanting to choose who I will Squad Lead and play with (my friends and unit members only)

- wanting to keep people who are able to follow simple commands like "come here", "follow me", "mount up/dismount" and kick people who can't

- people with no microphone (very hazardous people to the whole squad in some situations)

- mic spam

- or just wanting to keep the squad small

 

I think every squad leader should be able to choose who he will play with and who he will not play with. There are sessions where you want to be as serious as possible, in our case, 90% of our play is like that. We have already got used to stuff that comes with playing with public players becuse we are unable to lock our squad. I will give just 1 example out of hundred others. We are holding a building with 2 entrances. I am holding west entrance and some random public player (if he finally agrees after telling him 15 times and does it) holds the east entrance. Couple of shots on east entrance are exchanged, and then comes dead silence ingame and comms. Couple of seconds later, I am dead. That public player did not say a word that he is down or wounded or the enemy is at his door, NOTHING. My point is, about public average players is: as a (good) squad leader, you got to NOT rely on public players in combat, only rely on your friends and unit members who understands your normal operating procedures. As in 80% public players is lacking off, brevity, map understanding and knowledge, situational awareness, no microphone, lack of english knowledge, lack of vision, your units understanding and interpretation of combat and movement, and most important lack of discipline in combat.

However with all this being said, new players that we meet on public servers, that like the game and are enthusiastic about it make for the best recruits.

Please give us locked squads, it is time... We need to be able to be in control, and trough that control fully enjoy what the game has to offer us, and to prevent possible hard feelings of kicking some players out of our squads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

we need lock squad option!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The people saying that locked squads are bad for teamwork have no idea what teamwork is.

 

Teamwork isn't cramming 9 people into a squad and then being barely able to keep track of what they're doing. Teamwork is multiple squads of different functions working together towards a common goal. Those squads may be composed of a 1-man squad driving logistics ALL GAME, a 4-man squad operating behind enemy lines to ambush enemy supply routes and tear down FOBs, two 2-man APC squads providing fire support and transport for the team, and a mix of 5-9 man infantry squads communicating together. Thinking that having just a bunch of 9-man squads instead somehow leads to superior teamwork just flies in the face of what we see in the game.

 

Not having locked squads is what is antithetical to gameplay because it doesn't allow the kind of complex team organization where communication and teamwork becomes important to success. Right now we have 9-man infantry squads rolling Strykers and BTRs straight into an objective and dumping it there, or having them lonewolf because the infantry squad leader isn't able to command his infantry while keeping track of the APC in his squad. You have vehicles strewn across the battlefield because you don't have dedicated transport, so infantry squads take a vehicle to where they're going, dump it there and move on foot, then are unable to reclaim it later because they've pushed far away from its position and can't be bothered to return it.

 

9-man squads are bad for teamwork, both within the squad because most SLs can't manage 9 people, and within the team because there's no squad specialization, resulting in poor use of assets, an inability for squads to effectively communicate, and a lack of structure within the team, leading to confusion about who's doing what and who can do what.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The word TEAMWORK is a meme at this point to be honest.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Some people are bad players so we should be allowed to lock EVERYONE out of our squad."

 

Yeah, it's totally the rest of us who don't get teamwork. You've got it down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11. 4. 2017 at 10:30 AM, desen said:

but it is a fact that it adds additional stress if you must switch between voice activation and push to talk in the game.


Here's an idea for you - only use in-game voip and english - no stress.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Valdr said:

"Some people are bad players so we should be allowed to lock EVERYONE out of our squad."

 

Yeah, it's totally the rest of us who don't get teamwork. You've got it down.


It's not about skill, it's about mentality.
When I first started playing Squad I tried to make it very clear that I had no prior experience with milsim multiplayer games of any degree beyond singleplayer of Arma 2.
Lo and behold people were patient.

It's a different situation, when people come in screaming and thrashing like it's CS:GO.
There are two types of people. People who read the store page description and people who read the store page description, but don't care.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

48 minutes ago, Peerun said:


It's not about skill, it's about mentality.
When I first started playing Squad I tried to make it very clear that I had no prior experience with milsim multiplayer games of any degree beyond singleplayer of Arma 2.
Lo and behold people were patient.

It's a different situation, when people come in screaming and thrashing like it's CS:GO.
There are two types of people. People who read the store page description and people who read the store page description, but don't care.

 

It doesn't even matter if it is about skill, the rules say a squad leader can kick someone for any reason and I support that. The problem is you are doing nothing to promote or reward good play when you lock everyone out. It will be no different from BF where every squad is a group of 4 friends doing their own thing and not cooperating with anyone because they are uber leet pros who are better than everyone else, and not communicating either because apparently it's just SO incredibly stressful to have to use a whole extra button to chat in game.

 

And you said it yourself: when you first started you told people you had no experience and they gave you a chance. Now explain to me how you are going to do that when everyone is in a locked squad and the only open one is full of people screaming and thrashing like it's CSGO? Who is teaching players in that situation how to properly play the game when they are all in locked squads?

Edited by Valdr

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Not being able to lock my squad, so often makes me not wanna SL. I can deal with having 2-3 newbies in the Squad. I cant deal with having 6-8 newbies in my Squad. Or rather, I dont want to SL 6-8 newbies, as at that point, it just becomes baby-sitting.

Then youll tell me that I shouldnt be SL, and that I should just join someone elses squad. Well, it just so happens that most SLs in Squad are newbs themselves, and after 1300 hours in the game, I dont want to play under a newbie SL every time I play.

So a lot of the time, I just opt to not play Squad on public servers at all.  Which I think is a shame, because I think the constant stream of new players could need an SL with some experience in the game, someone like myself.

If I could lock my Squads (or limit the size of it), I would make 6-man for the most parts. If I would have enough players in the squad that I could trust (friends for example), then I might go bigger as I would probably be able to handle a few more newcomers.

 

Edited by plissken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My clan SH (Spearhead) welcomes random players when we play Project Reality or Squad. Even newbies as long they are willing to learn and have a microphone.

 

But even we want to lock our squad at some point. For instance if we do assets in PR where you may want to keep another asset in reserve and just don't need more people. Another case is when we do infantry and need space for a mate. And the last most frequent case, especially in Squad, when players with usually no mics keep joining and spawn in nowhere with limited kits. It is really not easy to keep track of it if you are already busy with squadleading and you want to rely on competent members for it.

 

There is a minority of small elite clans which are not very hospital towards new people but we still don't need to reinvent the wheel. In PR all servers normally have admins, an anti nomicers policy and a rule which states that you cannot lock a squad below a certain amount of players. In special cases admins can just force you to unlock.

 

The solution would be to actively administrate and finally allow server hosts in Squad to kick people for not having microphones. Now I know some DEVs are against this idea because it could scare off some players. Nonetheless, a bad gaming experience for current active and experienced players causes the worst marketing you can possibly get. Gameplay should have highest priority since it means happy customers which market your product for free among their friends and this is much more profitable in the long term. ;-)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Peerun said:


Here's an idea for you - only use in-game voip and english - no stress.

 

 



because some members of your squad cant understand the foreign language. 

 

 

=

 

some other good ideas from your side ?

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now