• Announcements

    • Merlin

      Forum Rules   07/06/2016

      Introduction   The Squad Team reserves the right to edit, update, add and remove rules at any time. Applicable rules extend to the PM system. Your PMs are private, but the Squad Team may be informed about unacceptable PM content by the receiving party.   Section I: Posting Rules   §1 Show Respect This community can only work if we all respect each other. To that end, it is imperative that any time you engage with another user, either directly or indirectly, you show them respect with the content of your post. In particular refrain from flaming, insulting, abusing, taunting, racism, and other similar types of actions towards other forum users.   §2 Attitude & Behavior Poor attitude and behavior are the most common ways a negative / unsafe environment is created and perpetuated. As such that kind of behavior will not be allowed on these forums. Please be mindful of this rule when posting personal positions and opinions regarding topics which could be considered contentious in nature. As a rule of thumb, keep your posts civil in nature, and refrain from making posts that are likely to incite arguments and create a negative environment. As a privately hosted web forum we reserve the right to maintain an environment that we are happy the majority of our players are comfortable with.   §3 Swearing While we will not strictly moderate every little swear that occurs, please try to avoid excessive bad language. The moderation reserves the right to remove rants and unsuitable content at any time.   §4 Illegal Topics
      Prohibited topics include, but are not limited to: Piracy, drugs (including cannabis), pornography, religion, racism, sexism, homo/trans -phobic content, videos and images showing violent death or serious injury, ‘spam threads’, hacking & griefing (endorsement thereof), religion, politics,  etc. Prohibition may be suspended for some threads if they are found to be suitable by the Moderation (such as scientific debate).
      If there is doubt, the Moderation Team can decide whether a topic is considered illegal.   §5 Attitude towards Squad and the Development Team
      As per §1 and §2, keep in mind to be respectful and reasonable, not only towards all users of the forum, but also towards the Squad Team and towards any ideas and content and the game itself. Criticism is welcome, but if it is not constructive and/or if it is offensive, the Moderation may need to step in. Please refrain from posting if you are upset, angry or drunk, or you may be punished for things you wouldn’t have otherwise written, which is not in anyone's interest.   §6 Language & Legibility
      Please post only in English. Non-English content (including non-legible content) may be removed. If you see someone posting in another language because s/he apparently does not speak English, please report their post - if you can, you may reply in their language to explain their question, but please do translate their and your message so it can be reviewed by the Moderation. ‘Hiding’ insults in non-English posts will be punished harshly. Posts written largely in ‘leetspeak’ or full of spelling / grammatical errors may be treated like non-English content. This rule does not extend to PMs.   §7 Forum structure & Search
      Please ensure when posting a new thread, that the thread is located inside the correct forum section. Check all forum section titles to judge where your thread should belong. Threads created in the wrong forum section will be moved or deleted.
      Before posting a new thread, please make use of the forum search to find older threads about the same topic. In doubt, it is recommended to rather post in an existing thread, unless that thread is years out of date. However, do not bump old threads without adding a new question / answer / insight that wasn’t in that thread before - use common sense.   §8 Thread Titles
      Please name your thread appropriately; the subject title should sum up / explain the content in the thread. If you fail to name your thread properly (such as ‘Hey!’ or ‘Check this out!’ or ‘Help!’), we will either rename or lock the topic. Repeated offense may lead to infractions. The practice of using CAPITALS only in your thread title is not allowed and will be edited or the thread will simply be deleted. Strange or abnormal Unicode characters should be excluded from thread titles for the sake of being distracting and unnecessary.
      §9 Thread Capitalization
      Please ensure that your post is not in all CAPITALS, as this is not allowed. Any threads posted in all caps will subsequently be removed from the forum. Repeated offenses may lead to infractions against your account. This practice is not approved or accepted here. 
        §10 Images in posts
      When posting images, mind the following restrictions:
      .gifs will be allowed and may be removed by Staff if deemed necessary.
      Maximum size for images is 1280x1024.
      Do not include more than ~1 large image per paragraph of text, unless in image collection / announcement threads. Link to further images.
      Consider posting thumbnails. You may post a few more images per post if they are reasonably small, the details are for the Moderation to judge.   §11 The use of BBCode
      It is allowed to use the BBCode in your posts. Over usage is not allowed. You may use the Bold in a reasonable manner but not for the whole text body. You may use the size feature but in a limited reasonable manner. You may not use any of the additional fonts at all. Color may be used to high light a point but again, not for the whole text body. Moderators will be watching for misuse and will edit when required without giving notice. Continued disregard for this rule will result in Moderator action in the form of warnings.   §12 Complaints of Server/Admin Abuse Reports of server/admin abuse will not be posted publicly. All reports concerning this type of behavior should be place in the appropriate sub-forum. http://forums.joinsquad.com/forum/241-report-server-admin-abuse/ All posts made outside of this area will be be removed.   Section II: Reporting & Moderation   §1 Reporting Posts
      There is a Post Report system in place. If you notice a post that violates forum rules, simply use the exclamation mark icon below the users avatar image to send a report to the Moderation. We will then review this post. Your report will not be made public and cannot be linked to your person by anyone outside of the Squad Team. You will not be punished for using the Report system even if the report was false, unless you repeatedly abuse the system to spam it.
      Do not ‘report’ posts by replying directly in public to them. In case of spambots, this prompts them to respond in turn, spamming the forum further. This also fuels flame wars and arguments.   §2 Reporting Moderators
      Moderators are subject to the same forum rules (and some additional rules / exceptions). If you think that a Moderator has treated you unfairly or is otherwise breaking forum rules, please PM the Lead Moderator or any Administrator. Do not accuse Moderators in public, the Squad Team will treat every complaint seriously and it is in our interest to discipline or remove Moderators who are known to break forum rules.   §3 Respect Squad Team members and Moderators
      Do not ignore or argue against Admin, Moderator or Dev instructions on the forum. If you have a complaint, as per §2, please inform the Team in private. You are expected to follow orders given by the Moderation, Administration and Development Team, and it is necessary for smooth running of the forum to respect their decisions. Being stubborn or ignoring warnings will lead to harsher punishments - however, we do not tolerate Moderator / Admin abuse of power / privileges, so do not hesitate to inform other Team members if you feel treated unfairly.   §4 Bans and multiple accounts
      If your account is temporarily or permanently banned, do NOT create another account. Bypassing a ban will result in further action, and a permanent ban of all of your accounts.
      You are not allowed to have more than one account for any reason. If you share an internet connection with another user who has their own account, it might happen that this account is incorrectly identified as a secondary account - please get in touch with the Moderation or Administration to resolve such issues.

Search the Community: Showing results for tags 'feedback'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • OWI Official
    • Announcements
    • Progress Updates
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
    • The Official Squad User Manual
    • Development Tutorials
  • International
    • Supported Languages
  • Game
    • General Discussion
    • Questions
    • Feedback & Suggestions
    • Media
    • User Created Guides
  • Support
    • Software Support
    • Hardware Tech Support
    • Website Feedback
    • Bug Report Form
  • The Community
    • Introductions / New Players
    • Teams & Clans
    • Events & Leagues
    • Wiki Development
    • Modding
  • Game Servers
    • Game Server Info & Support
    • Game Server Feedback
  • Off Topic
    • Off-Topic Discussion

Found 37 results

  1. Welcome to Desmo's Playground We feature one 80 player server located in New York. New York We are a community centered around the streamer DesmoLocke. We offer a friendly environment for both grizzled veterans and hapless newbs. Our #1 priority is fun public teamwork. We welcome clans and other groups on the server. We only ask that you don't stack all clans to one team. Thank you. We hope you enjoy our playgrounds as much as we do. Please refer to our subreddit for a complete listing of our rules and expectations and any questions concerning the administration of our servers. For immediate help feel free to join us on Discord. Community Founder: DesmoLocke New York server owner/operator: TR00P3R 20+ admins active across several timezones These are the rules of our server, not following them will first result in a warning and/or kick (depending on the circumstance), followed by a ban. Any racism whatsoever is NOT tolerated. Join squads, the game is about teamwork do NOT Lone Wolf. SL's require a microphone, those who do not will be kicked. SL's MUST communicate over the command channel. Focus on and support the objectives. This should be your thought process in everything you do. If Your superFOB in the corner of the map cannot support an objective either in defense or attack then you are not helping. (This is at the discretion of the admin team). Apologize when you teamkill and never retaliate if team-killed! The admin team has the right to remove you from the server for any reason deemed detrimental to the community. SLs must use the squad leader kit. The role is effectively useless without it and continued use will be considered trolling. (We are not idiots, we understand sometime you can become SL without warning, just change your kit ASAP if you are going to keep the job). Do not use swear words in your user name. Immature user names must be changed. Refusal to do so will result in a ban. Do not abuse the suicide command. It is there to relieve players hindered by bugs and glitches. Respect your fellow players. Do not troll. (It saddens me to add this in writing but people are that obtuse). Overall use common sense and have fun! NEW RULE! Effective April 13th, 2017. Do not rush the enemy first caps. Do not rush past the middle flag until they have been captured. The two closest flags to each main are protected. They are not to be interfered with until captured. (This rule only applies to AAS layers) FOBs must be placed at least 300 meters, one large grid squad, from Main. Server seeding rules. When server is low pop, less than 20v20, the following rules apply: Do not attack or camp or destroy FOBs/HABs. Do not use any vehicle except logistics trucks. Fight over a single central point such as Mosque on Sumari. Do not place a FOB or HAB within 100 meters of the middle flag.
  2. Please leave Bugs and Issues here with screenshots attached. Not a place to theory craft or idealize about the map. just help spot bugs only. cheers
  3. Weekend Preparations!

    What are you doing to get ready for this weekend's Closed Pre-Alpha access for Airborne and Commander backers?! I just got done cutting the grass in my yard. I usually do this early Saturday, but I didn't want to waste an hour this weekend and miss an hour of Squad. I also plan to stock up on supplies (food, drinks) on Thursday. I may not leave my house this weekend... And I'm ok with that.
  4. Please leave Bugs and Issues here with screenshots attached. Not a place to theory craft or idealize about the map. just help spot bugs only. cheers
  5. To the developers of Squad, First I want to say that you have created a wonderful game and that I value your dedication to continually adding to the game as time passes. As a veteran that has seen VBIEDS (Car bomb) in action and the pure terror and disruption they cause to operations I feel adding a low manpower cost (1-5 tickets depending on size of vehicle and payload) VBIED that already has explosives embedded in the vehicle and only needs a left click from the driver to detonate would add not only add another level of strategy but be a fun addition and level the playing field between the OPFOR and US forces due to OPFOR having terribly weak vehicles that get shredded by the US Striker. I've noticed most players already try to make them by placing IED's on cars however this is not effective because of the high ticket cost, lag time between cell call and detonation, and the coordination between the Scout and driver to make it happen. I feel that if developed the only way to be able to take one of these down should be by AT weapons carried by soldiers. I've seen these vehicles take high caliber rounds and RPGs ricochet off the armor only to still meet their targets. This addition would place emphasis on combined arms operations and force squads to stick near vehicles to protect them and the squad itself. As a balance I feel AT soldiers should carry 4 rockets. I look forward to your response. More suggestions to follow.
  6. Hello everyone! Talic1337 and I started up a new server for squad. We wanted something that was new player friendly and all around just fun. It is an 80 player server based out of Chicago. For the last couple of days we have been taking in a lot of new players and showing them how fun squad can be. New players or veterans feel free to check us out. We are mainly on at 8pm ET and on. For the next four weeks, we are doing a raffle of Steam gift cards for those that have played in the server. $10 gift cards will be given away in our weekly raffles. We would love to get some feedback on the server. Stop on in and say hi. Our subreddit is https://www.reddit.com/r/TaliconsPunhouse/.
  7. I'm opening this thread to provide the community with a space for feedback about my server and to comply with the developers' licensing criteria MapRotation.cfg Chora AAS v1 Fool's Road AAS v1 Yehorivka AAS v2 Kohat AAS v2 Logar Valley AAS v1 Chora AAS v2 Gorodok AAS v1 Kohat AAS v1
  8. So tonight I tried to SL because no one else would do it, later on in the round I try to put an RP down only to find out that you get a 90sec cool down if your not close enough to your squad mates and again if you too close to enemies. My squad got screwed by this 3 times in the same match. I under stand a cooldown so SL's can't spam it, I don't understand a cooldown when you cant use it because one of the other rules. Edit: I guess there is already a feedback thread on this, sorry for repost. A mod can delete it if they wish.
  9. So this is a minor suggestion that I don't expect to be taken very seriously but it is something that I would hope would be addressed. The pre-match warm-up is already longer than must start times are in other games, but as an experienced squad leader, I must say that sometimes I wish that not only did I have more pre-game warm up time to coordinate my spawn, but, that I had a thirty to sixty second period in which I could coordinate and organize my team at the spawn base without fear of all the vehicles being taken.
  10. Post good and bad feedback here from today's Alpha 8 play test. provide screenshots and share system information. It's tremendously helpful. Thank you. IF you have video feedback, please upload to YouTube as Unlisted and provide to link to @Karm CPU: 4790K GPU: 980Ti SSD: Samsung 850 Evo 1TB RAM: 32GB @2400MHz Performance seems improved. Getting higher average FPS all around. Although, I play capped at 60 in borderless, so I only notice dips below 50. Found this
  11. I think it would be best to have the weapon sway when scoped as well as recoil based on a combination of things such as weapon weight, stamina, health and suppression (and obviously stance). It seems optimal to have a system where you plug in the projectile weight and exit speed to find out the initial kick then have weapon weight telling the game how much the final kick is reduced by. Another thing would be to have previous shots add up realistically based on when the kick occurs. For example if the kick happens when the gun is going back from a previous shot it will affect it differently than when the gun is going forward from bouncing off the shoulder. This system could also be plugged into ballistics for more accurate shot deviation during automatic fire. If the gun is recoiling back when the next shot happens the projectile will have slightly less energy making it fall short a very tiny bit. This is probably a little extreme and I think the best implementation would be a simplified version of my recoil system. Another thing is I prefer the style of aiming that RedOrchestra and Insurgency use because when you are scoped in your whole view isn't moving its just your gun, and you fire when your gun is on target rather than how it is now where your view has to be aligned. This is closer to real life aiming as your head and eyes are really good at staying locked on to a target. Thanks for taking time to read this.
  12. So, there is Sensitivity variables in: %AppData%\Local\Squad\Saved\Config\WindowsNoEditor\GameUserSettings.ini Line 9: AimSensitivity=0.067500 SteamLibrary\steamapps\common\Squad\Engine\Config\BaseInput.ini Line 21: +AxisConfig=(AxisKeyName="MouseX",AxisProperties=(DeadZone=0.f,Exponent=1.f,Sensitivity=0.07f)) Line 22: +AxisConfig=(AxisKeyName="MouseY",AxisProperties=(DeadZone=0.f,Exponent=1.f,Sensitivity=0.07f)) SteamLibrary\steamapps\common\Squad\Squad\Config\DefaultInput.ini Line 9: -AxisConfig=(AxisKeyName="MouseX",AxisProperties=(DeadZone=0.f,Exponent=1.f,Sensitivity=0.07f)) Line 10: -AxisConfig=(AxisKeyName="MouseY",AxisProperties=(DeadZone=0.f,Exponent=1.f,Sensitivity=0.07f)) Line 15: +AxisConfig=(AxisKeyName="MouseX",AxisProperties=(DeadZone=0.000000,Sensitivity=0.070000,Exponent=1.000000,bInvert=False)) Line 16: +AxisConfig=(AxisKeyName="MouseY",AxisProperties=(DeadZone=0.000000,Sensitivity=0.070000,Exponent=1.000000,bInvert=False)) Line 138: AimSensitivity=4.700000 Also, there is bEnableFOVScaling=False and bEnableMouseSmoothing=False I kinda understand how FOV scaling works. It multiply mouse sensivity by FOV Scale(0.011110). But it would be nice to see actual formulas. BTW, I get different accelleration(depending on how fast or slow I move my mouse) with mouse smoothing enabled, so I disabled it. It would be nice if devs explained how whole mouse sensitivity thing works with formulas, please. But that's not why I've created this thread. I've created this thread because there is at least 5 places where you can set your mouse sensitivity. I figured that 'end' mouse sensitivity is a result of +AxisConfig Sensitivity multiplied by AimSensitivity variable in GameUserSettings.ini. So, let's say I've got 0.067500 in GameUserSettings.ini and Sensitivity=0.07f in +AxisConfig. My 'end' mouse sensitivity is: 0.067500*0.07=0.004725. At some point of time I changed +AxisConfig Sensitivity to 0.01 and AimSensitivity to 0.4725, my in-game sens didn't change but it became kinda smoother and more responsive, especially at lower FPS. Now I ended up with +AxisConfig Sensitivity=0.000001 and AimSensitivity=4725.000(GameUserSettings.ini) and I still get the exact same 'real life' sensitivity but it feels much smoother, more responsive and it is actually easier to aim, track enemies and spray than with default values of 0.067500*0.07... I understand that you used 0.07 value in +AxisConfig Sensitivity because of people with low DPI(400-800) and because it's alpha and you didn't have time to convert 4725.000 number to a proper 0.4725 sensitivity etc. But can you please explain the whole sensitivity thing, please? There's actually other option. You can set +AxisConfig Sensitivity=1.000000 and AimSensitivity=0.004725 and get the exact same end(0.004725) and in-game sensitivity again... But which is better: 0.067500*0.07, 0.000001*4725.000 or 1.000000*0.004725? What would you recommend and why? And what about Exponent argument for +AxisConfig? What about raw Input and direct Input? At the moment I just play with AimSensitivity=4725.000 in GameUserSettings.ini and +AxisConfig Sensitivity=0.000001... Devs, pls explain.
  13. As per Bruno-G's suggestion, here is a separate thread on MT-LB 6MB model. Much of what is missing on the 6MB is correct for the regular MT-LB as well. Abstract My premise for spotting model differences to IRL counterpart was largely based on consistency with the level of detailing Devs chose for the models. For instance, detailing as low as mudguard hinges is present on the 3D model. As such I am not counting amount of track links or sprocket bolts, but visually noticeable detailing. Naturally there are differences between IRL vehicles as well, therefore I tried to reach the most common contemporary denominator that has the least amount of detailing. I will not be posting reference material here, but it can be added at a later stage. Lastly I have not seen the model close up, so there might be other issue, but I will update them when we all get our hands on the vehicle.
  14. Hi OWI Devs and fellow Squad players. I like the scout class and the SKS. It improves teamwork and it somewhat makes sense, that if you have an 10 rnds rifle you get the binoculars as well in order to guide and provide assistance to your squad. I thought about how to improve the kit - in a tactical "pro-teamplay" way - by increasing its value to other players (not its combat efficiency based on the primary weapon). In the Updates tab related to the update on A7, it is written: " Added Scout kit for Insurgents and Militia. The kit contains SKS as the primary weapon and also has a set of binoculars. This kit is perfect for scouting and directing fire. Kit will get more toys in the future " My hopes, dreams and expectations or such "Toys": - Possible IED ?`Nothing much to say here I guess... - Soviet flare for tactical signals, or as battlefield illumination. Example from Chechnya: - Anti-personell Landmine or tripwire-mine. (Nasty, but with the AAS system this would make sense). - Wire Cutter for instant/Fast removal of barbed wire Regarding the armament of the scout, I would not mind if he had access to the AKSU. The SKS is probably the superior choice for medium to long distance - yet the (less accurate and weaker) aksu might work better in urban environments. [if you considder answering to this topic and you´re a non-DEV, please take your time for a proper response ]
  15. In war films, I've noticed ambient noise like gunfire, explosions, yelling, etc is picked up in a soldier's comms and sent through to the channel when they're talking. Can this be added to Squad? Sometimes when I'm Squad Leader I'll get other SL's asking me how something is going; I'm mid firefight and I'll accidentally yell back to them whilst I'm shooting. On occasion I've had "no need to yell man" come back from them, which I then apologise and explain I was shooting at the same time. There wouldn't be this confusion if he heard all the gunfire when I opened my channel. I think it would add great immersion layer to the comms channels. Obviously it wouldn't be necessary for the local VOIP, just Squad/SL channels
  16. US Acog

    Not sure if I saw a post on this, didn't see anything specific when I searched so figure I would post something. I would like to talk about the ACOG kit, primarily the US forces ACOG class. For me that ACOG has terrible recoil currently, the reset takes way too long to be a usable gun. I find myself most the time trying to go for a head shot (which isn't as effective as a body shot) because the recoil reset is so bad if I miss the second kill shot, the enemy will have already moved on and taken cover. I understand the advantage with the ACOG so having a bit more of recoil makes sense but the current recoil is over the top. If something like the Militia ACOG kit could be implemented which is really good maybe even too good but if something like that could be done on all ACOG classes I think that would make the class extremely effective again and can effect the matches/gameplay in a positive way.
  17. Hey can someone or one of the Devs tell me how the IED's will function in Squad? I'm intrigued by the art of "ALLAHU AKBARING" and I would very much like the IED's to resemble much of like real life, maybe a medium blast range (75m) and a very loud explosion that can be heard miles away, followed by gorgeous black/thick smoke effects shooting up way into the sky like a cloud, that should make people feel terrified. Shrapnel would carry over the length of the bomb blast, clinking against solid objects. If close to the explosion a vibration should be heard, like a really loud speaker, followed by a Tinnitus sound effect, and a ringing of the ear (in game audio of course). Sound should also in my opinion channel around different urban/non-urban settings (through corridors, mountains, etc). Even have the sound of the explosion sound different indoors. Dirt should spit up on detonation of the bomb, heck, even add a small stringy like blood effect to be seen when enemies are caught in the explosion. The new smoke physics being implemented will make for some great smoke effects. (Maybe even add a voice that yells something in Arabic, before he activates the detonation, if not that's okay). In regards to the placement of explosives, AT Mines should function like they do in PR (digging them underneath the ground), and i also think IED's should be more like Insurgency where you just place it down instead, or maybe give an option to set them down however you like: disguised or not disguised (that's where shovels will come into play). Edit: okay maybe 500m is a bit of a fetch. I think the blast radius of the IED in game should be around like 75-100 at most. 150m should maybe be for like a car/truck bomb or something. P.S because I'm on mobile when I was creating this discussion it duplicated the post, please don't forget to check out the other same post as it has some interesting discussion in it: http://forums.joinsquad.com/topic/13024-how-bigloud-will-the-explosion-of-the-ieds-be-in-squad/
  18. Haven't done this for a good while but after seeing the state of the forums recently (i will go onto this at the end), I thought I would go back to writing a post on the new release and prove their are still members within this community who believe in this game. I'll point out quickly that this is, as always, my opinion and this may change over time (emphasis on the word initial). UI Map - On first load up, I wasn't keen on the new map colour. But after the second round, I really started to get into it. I love the look of a drone-style thermal over view, which is how the grey scale feels. I think a more defined black highlighting across terrain changes would help the cosmetics, as I can understand why people may be confused when identifying increase/decrease in terrain levels. I know that this is a placeholder as the UI will continue to improve, but as a start, I like the direction. Role/Kit menu - Love it. I loved it when we went to the 2d drawings of the kit on the equipment select (1-6) way back when and now expanding this to the kit selection and comma rose is beautiful. Player icons - Unsure on the shapes. I have been trying to get used to these for a while but personally, the previous circle with FOV direction looked better with less confusion. I love the new colours and think that against the grey background, they are perfect. But I can understand why people may be confused by the new arrow shapes. Additionally, I think your player icon needs to go underneath the squad leader. There were a few people who complained that, when in a compound along side the squad leader, it was hard to make out his location as their own icon was over the top of the SL. Little tweaks here and there will make these new icons work great. Medic map - I stated in another feedback thread that the medic seems to have been dumbed down too much. I understand the direction to go with different icons for various player states, but there are too many icons for too many people. For starters, (and this will split opinions) a medics own squad is always first priority. These new icons make it impossible to distinguish between other squads and your own squad which does not add any benefit to the game play. Second point is, the icons on the map are too much. Players who are bleeding can sort themselves out (everyone has bandages) so, IMO, there is no need to identify these on the map. Additionally, the new icons for players who are incapacitated don't fit the squad feel. If the general public want the incap to be identified, a normal player icon in red would do the same job without these new "flat line" icons. There's nothing offensive about these icons, but it seems to be further taking the communication essence out of the medic. Everyone who plays the medic loves the "searching" side of the class. The calling out and the hunting for that team mate. The good medics (who stick with their squad) will usually rely just on their compass ID markers and will argue that is all they need. I would go as far as saying the majority of the "skill" has gone from the medic with these icons. Yes a good medic will always be priceless and takes time to master, but the edge to be "in the right place at the right time" looks like it might be gone. AAS Ticket system/bleed This is something I feel strongly about. It has to be right. People were complaining in V4 about rounds being over too quickly, losing by massive amounts. While this was true at the start, once people realised they could no longer play TDM in A1, (as they were in V3) there was starting to be a noticeable reduction in loss and victory deficits. There was the well known issue of people giving up too often (which is still there) which was 2 tickets, and the loss of tickets for losing a cap (30 tickets). I will just state that, in my opinion, if a team has been pushed back to their last flag, they should lose hard and quickly. This is AAS, so if you have failed to secure your flags, you should be punished. You have had all game to defend the two flags (or more) that you captured. This new bleed amount for holding the opponents last flag has extended the time for a round to finish. Last night we had to sit with our thumbs up our arses and defend Train station on OP first light for over 10 minutes (which isn't hard as the majority of squad players only work on a one way, direct line system). When this happens, it becomes extremely boring (for both teams). If anything, the enemy capping your last flag should be an instant loss. I've spoken with Z-Trooper about windows of opportunity to turn the battle and how long they last, how often they are available etc etc. A team has failed to do this in the duration of two flags being captured? That is a player issue, not a mechanic issue. The games are now lasting a lot longer, and that's the way it should be IF the teams are well matched and the battle is over the centre cap and the -1. But if a team has been steam rolled to their last flag, it is not fair for them to continue being hammered for another 10 - 15 minutes. That isn't doing anything for morale. I believe taking the bleed back to 1 per second for losing your last flag is fine. NB: I haven't had chance to do the math over objective gain/loss so I will update this with numbers so people can better understand the focus on each flag. Map updates OP first light has been my favourite map since day one (even when it was the tree infested "forest") and the new statics and objective areas are divine. The new village and statics across the map have added real variety towards approach of the objective, as previously the map saw extremely predictable maneuvers onto each cap zone. Great job devs! It was a great decision to keep this map in the game and reinvent it. Chora - well, not updated yet due to @IrOnTaXi getting too fruity at GDC and forgetting to update it. Personally I find this hilarious and it's great to know that our boys at OWI are human and indulge in the finer things in life (cocaine included). Fools Road - Still a gorgeous map that continues to improve with every update. Weapon handling Weapon sway - A minor difference which feels like it has really changed fire fights. I've actually found shooting a lot easier, I am unsure if this is down to me subconsciously negating sway previously (when there was no need) based on prior gaming experience. But I am finding that I am much more effective in fire fights than I was previously. Jumping A welcomed change that has re-invigorated my love and passion for chora!! That is all I have for the minute. I will look to update as and when my opinion changes (if it does). I will note I never play with optics on Squad so I have no experience of the changes to the scopes. I'll finish with thanking our devs for maintaining their hard work and dedication to this game. I have been (as always) very vocal in my support for OWI in the recent weeks. The continuous stream of questioning of integrity and motive recently knocks me sick. I have got to know some of the team very well and it really is offensive to see these part time batty boys pop up with their one-post contribution questioning the dedication of the team. Despite a few tweaks here and there (based off my opinion), you boys have knocked it out of the park again, with a solid build which only goes to pay tribute to the work you and everyone within the QA team (I haven't forgotten you lot) put into this game. I'm not a sentimental person, but giving a reasoned voice as a backing to our devs has been needed for nearly a month. I believed the new build was the right opportunity to do so. Thanks for reading. DannyT/BLITZA
  19. Death of the AAS Game Mode

    Hi everyone, I believe that this game has the danger of losing part of its player-base (even though it's in its very early stages). The AAS (Assault and Secure) game-mode is fundamentally flawed (IMO), allow me to explain. Squad promotes itself as a realistic tactical FPS, however the principle of only having the ability to attack & defend a single point at any given time goes against sound reasoning & judgement. I would like to have the ability to assault any point, at any given time - much as you would have the capability of doing so IRL. My reasoning for finding the current model flawed is that you get many games where teams are disorganized, and struggle to coordinate themselves. It makes the game no fun to play due to a single squad failing to hold a position and as a result (generally speaking), creating a chain-reaction and losing every single point before anyone can react due to the main fight being all the way across the map! Allowing squads to make their own decisions based upon the ability to assault any point as they see fit, will allow better use of tactics and add to the overall enjoyment of the AAS game-mode. What I don't like is the game turning into a "relay-race", in which a single squad (just a few people) runs ahead of everyone else, anticipating their teams success so they can back-cap out from under their enemy and then rush to the next point causing them to win the game. This bullying tactic is happening more often than some may realize and it really does not create a fun gaming atmosphere. My 2 cents - Lets have a good discussion around this please. Update: I am very happy with the quality of this debate, lets keep it up!
  20. Hello Squad forums! ^^ This is my first post here so go easy on me. Basically I'm an old PR player originating from the clan MeRk which I'm sure some of the other PR players have heard of. I have been playing Squad a lot, since the pre-alpha, in order to sharpen my skills before the final product and these are the things that I've found really needs to be reworked. I would love for people to question my ideas and give me different perspectives on the problems that I will state. Given my PR background and the fact that I have played this game for a reasonable long time now, I find my proposals valid. 1. Markers In PR, the squad leader has the ability to place markers on the map which will appear for every squad member in his squad i.e. attack or observe markers. These markers will also create a small and subtle arrow for every squad member, indicating in which direction on the compass the marker is placed, and create a line between the markers position on the map and your own position on the map. The squad leader is able to place these both by holding down T and aiming at a position, choosing the preferred marker with a left click and thus placing the marker on the aimed position, or going into his general map mode which I guess Squads equivalent is pressing Enter and right clicking on a position on the map. This tools is really useful when it comes to coordinating a squad. Not only does it give the squad members a better sense of what the actual real-time objective is, it actually makes the experience a bit more forgiving when squad leading new players. I can see that the developers have tried something similar with objective markers and have combined them with unit markers, which in my opinion haven't really worked out. Don't get me wrong, it's brilliant the new system for setting unit markers but I really do think that the system for setting objective markers should be reconsidered and switched to something more like the PR style. Or maybe just implementing the PR system of setting “squad markers” on top of the existing one. If this happens, you will see much more coordinated squads, more teamwork and a community getting more enjoyment out of the game 2. Map This one really goes hand in hand with point number 1. I love the fact that there’s so many levels of zoom available by pressing M and then zooming in with N. But when I’m a squad leader and I want to relay information on the map of enemy positions to the team. I find myself forced to stop dead in my tracks when I press Enter. This really has a heavy toll on the pace the squad has moving forward. One of the best ways of gaining momentum with your squad is actually leading by example and spearheading the column. Forcing me to stop just to put up an infantry marker simply feels clumsy. I would love if I had the ability to move with the “w,a,s,d” buttons whilst utilizing this map mode. 3. Radio Let’s start this section of by saying that the sound of the radio is on point but it lacks functionality. I don’t know if you’re planning to implement this in the future but I can’t work out why for the love of god I can’t talk to other squads individually. Maybe this has to do with my settings and I will investigate this immediately after finishing this feedback thread but If it is an actual choice, I would say it’s a poor one. Having squad leaders talking in (what is referred to in PR) all chat is extremely annoying. Most of the squad leaders in the game at this stage has no idea of the value from audible intelligence (i.e. gunshots) which leads to them disturbing the squad leader of every squad in the team. I do accept that this game is a public one an there will always be some geniuses spamming the all chat. But removing the ability to talk to individual squad leaders altogether kind of forces squad leaders to disturb other squad leaders unnecessarily. 4. Player name popup whilst hoovering over their name I have noticed that you have implemented a system which allows for people to see the players name, kit and squad when they hover over their dot with their mouse. Although this looks nice, it really don’t seem to be working out all too good. Most of the time I try to set markers the marker options disappear when my mouse is close enough to the dot of another player. Thus making it practically impossible to mark close proximity enemies when your squad is in a tight grouping. Even trying to find the name of a random player close to another one is a difficult task. I recommend switching to something which gives you the players name and kit when you actually click on their name. This would be loads smoother in my opinion. All and all the game looks solid and I have really enjoyed playing Squad these last months. These are just opinions and I would love some feedback on my feedback so to speak. Thanks for all your efforts and I look forward to some response! See you on the battlefield, [NB] Cuttish out. [NB] – Nordic Battalion (FYI: I’m Swedish and prone to typos)
  21. UI feedback imho

    Please accept my humble, howbeit stark, criticisms.
  22. While there are several immersion/gunplay suggestions I could make, I'm not sure if this game is so focused on it yet. I'm really enjoying playing so far, but some of the core mechanics are making it feel a bit too arcadey and not tactical enough yet. A Few suggestions I have 1. Planning phase One of my favorite features of the old game Rouge Spear was the planning phase, I never see it in games anymore. You have 300 seconds of just sitting, waiting for the match to start and then 10 minutes of players capturing empty flags. Divvy up the empty flags and just let Squads begin fortifying or pushing. For that first 300 seconds Give the SLs the tools to make a full plan on the map (including planned fortifications). This includes drawing movement paths. And then improvise when it goes to hell. 2. Harder Respawn Punishments While this will probably be ultimately up to the servers, I'm seeing too much arcade like Kamikaze style gameplay already. Imagine how different the dynamics of the game would be if it was a 50v50 game and you only got one life per round? While I wouldn't suggest something so extreme, the current system of low respawn times and putting rally points/FOBs near capture areas promotes careless game play, and turns fights into attrition, not tactics. One Idea would be modifying the insurgency respawn system. Instead of a timer the SL could call a wave of reinforcements (respawning all dead squad members) but it would have a more extreme cooldown than the current respawn rate. 3. Fix the Rally Point System. As mentioned before. The current Rally Point System is so forgiving it is broken and promotes exploiting it to overcome enemies through attrition. Rally points shouldn't be allowed within 400m of an enemy flag or FOB. The cooldown time for placing Rally points should be longer 3. Commander Role Squad leaders need a commander to lead them. Like the commander role in BF2, This wound is a specialized position that would primarily remain at the base or FOB with the map open. Winning teams would have a good commander with squads that listen. This might be a pipe dream for this level of cooperation to happen on pub servers. It would be great to incentify following orders somehow. 4. Enemy can hear nearby "talking" This has been talked about in other threads, but it's worth bringing up again. Ambushing requires stealth and silence. When the SL says aloud "Go check the other side of the wall" if there is a guy on the other side of the wall he should hear them. The obvious objection is that it would fragment the community by promoting the use of 3rd party VOIP. In Insurgency/Arma it's always the SERVERS promoting using 3rd party voIP. If the servers don't encourage it, I think most players will use the in-game audio system. Those who don't we have to pretend are psychic. 5.Muzzle Flash/Gun Smoke/Overheat Guns flash, Sustained fire produces visible smoke. Seem like something that could be implemented that gives you another thing to worry about. Overheating would be another cool feature that promotes more tactical gameplay as well. 6. Hardcore Options I'm probably the only one, but I love the amount of accidental team killing that happens in this game. I think it adds a whole other level to the need to communication and teamwork. While servers need to protect from griefers, this can be monitored by making sure a player isn't killing too many teammates at a certain rate (aka you should kick a player who has killed 7 teammates in a row with a rifle, but not the one who just accidently killed 8 with a misthrown grenade). It would be awesome if servers could turn off the floating name options, making players really check their maps and their shots. I would also suggest a separate server option to turn off the "you TKed X" warning, putting more pressure on the SL to mind their Squad.
  23. Well here we are. It has been a refreshing change to having many of us creating videos and supporting Squad, we have all shared and enjoyed the game, created montages and show reels, tutorials and action pieces to promote the game we all love. But now the game goes live I feel our time is over, the big youtube players out there who put no effort into their videos will gain thousands and thousands of views, meaning we will be forgotten and swept a side, our job here is done, it was great to promote Squad and garner others passion for this game. I had camera support taken away for a misunderstanding so there was no way for me to stand out anymore. It has been great to support each other during closed alpha and it feels to me like a close group will be blown open (for the good I know), and I am sure I will still do the odd video now and then, so thanks to our community and devs for the support of an amazing game, the community really has a passion for Squad as do I long may this continue while the carpet bombing of topics and complaints of new players floods in. Its been great to be part of a closed knit small community who all want the same thing. I salute you all. See you on the other side. Para. Let the Noob carnage begin....
  24. A few broad questions and comments (not necessarily directed to just the developers) with regards to the game design, which many games suffer from, particularly multiplayer games, and perhaps it is time for a studio to step in and address them - (Disclaimer: the tone is critical and supposed to drive conversation, it's not meant to be offensive.) (Question 1) Firstly, why aren't there logistics in the game? Where assets are brought in from off the map (paradrops, truck convoys, and so on), and soldiers don't just materialise from nothing, so there are convoys that you have an incentive to protect, etc, supply lines becoming an important aspect to the game. Sick of things 'pinging' into existence, it really undermines the realistic theme. At least have the game obey basic laws of physics, even if the premise of fighting in the bizarre Battle Royale arena style scenario is peculiar, and really that should also be baked into the concept of the game anyway. (Question 2) And at the same time, why are the objectives so contrived? They should be set by the players based on a loose mission brief, these absurd 'capture points' where you need to sit in a location, which no leader in their right mind would want to defend, for an arbitrary amount of time is getting old. It removes legitimate strategy, and the element of restriction of information, and particularly the role uncertainty plays in building tension and suspense, not knowing what your opponent is going to do. And subsequently players should fear death more, probably by the additions such as pain (screaming, panic, not being quite dead, etc.), gore, and a accompanying medic requirements, such as evacuation (body dragging), medic tents and so on (again supporting the need for logistics, but not necessarily needing immensely sophisticated damage systems, although localised wounds effecting the abilities of the soldier would be a massive improvement). (Question 3) Why are the gamemodes so unimaginative? It would be incredible if one of the supply methods for the logistics to be airdrop from a low orbiting starship for example, that wouldn't be completely outside of the realms the suspense of disbelief considering the game's theme. Consider how surreal it would be. Okay, maybe that's not completely serious suggestion, but frankly it would be badass to cross science fiction with modern military, that would be a strange and wonderful combination. Really though, more grounded than that but still extreme, outlandish maps and gamemode could be added, keep the theme but place it in an alternate universe in some outrageous war. Things such as a D-Day like assault on a fortress, charging in on Blackhawks evading flak fire, landing, taking out the flak to enable paradrops, overrun the fortress and win, it could be sensational. These mind numbing, boring, tired gamemodes that demean the building of dread need to end, and imagination brought back. Everyone jumping out of trucks at the staging area and piling into Blackhawks while sirens wail as the rotors spin up, flying for a couple of minutes in the relative calm, then suddenly the flak begins and all hell breaks loose. That's terrifying, and of course can be applied to a less crazy scenario. Nothing stopping these things from becoming a reality, especially considering the studio has complete creative freedom over the game. Emphasis though should be on the consistency aspect, particularly logistics. The materialising of assets really demeans combat in general. What do you think?