Forum Rules 07/06/2016Introduction The Squad Team reserves the right to edit, update, add and remove rules at any time. Applicable rules extend to the PM system. Your PMs are private, but the Squad Team may be informed about unacceptable PM content by the receiving party. Section I: Posting Rules §1 Show Respect This community can only work if we all respect each other. To that end, it is imperative that any time you engage with another user, either directly or indirectly, you show them respect with the content of your post. In particular refrain from flaming, insulting, abusing, taunting, racism, and other similar types of actions towards other forum users. §2 Attitude & Behavior Poor attitude and behavior are the most common ways a negative / unsafe environment is created and perpetuated. As such that kind of behavior will not be allowed on these forums. Please be mindful of this rule when posting personal positions and opinions regarding topics which could be considered contentious in nature. As a rule of thumb, keep your posts civil in nature, and refrain from making posts that are likely to incite arguments and create a negative environment. As a privately hosted web forum we reserve the right to maintain an environment that we are happy the majority of our players are comfortable with. §3 Swearing While we will not strictly moderate every little swear that occurs, please try to avoid excessive bad language. The moderation reserves the right to remove rants and unsuitable content at any time. §4 Illegal Topics
Prohibited topics include, but are not limited to: Piracy, drugs (including cannabis), pornography, religion, racism, sexism, homo/trans -phobic content, videos and images showing violent death or serious injury, ‘spam threads’, hacking & griefing (endorsement thereof), religion, politics, etc. Prohibition may be suspended for some threads if they are found to be suitable by the Moderation (such as scientific debate).
If there is doubt, the Moderation Team can decide whether a topic is considered illegal. §5 Attitude towards Squad and the Development Team
As per §1 and §2, keep in mind to be respectful and reasonable, not only towards all users of the forum, but also towards the Squad Team and towards any ideas and content and the game itself. Criticism is welcome, but if it is not constructive and/or if it is offensive, the Moderation may need to step in. Please refrain from posting if you are upset, angry or drunk, or you may be punished for things you wouldn’t have otherwise written, which is not in anyone's interest. §6 Language & Legibility
Please post only in English. Non-English content (including non-legible content) may be removed. If you see someone posting in another language because s/he apparently does not speak English, please report their post - if you can, you may reply in their language to explain their question, but please do translate their and your message so it can be reviewed by the Moderation. ‘Hiding’ insults in non-English posts will be punished harshly. Posts written largely in ‘leetspeak’ or full of spelling / grammatical errors may be treated like non-English content. This rule does not extend to PMs. §7 Forum structure & Search
Please ensure when posting a new thread, that the thread is located inside the correct forum section. Check all forum section titles to judge where your thread should belong. Threads created in the wrong forum section will be moved or deleted.
Before posting a new thread, please make use of the forum search to find older threads about the same topic. In doubt, it is recommended to rather post in an existing thread, unless that thread is years out of date. However, do not bump old threads without adding a new question / answer / insight that wasn’t in that thread before - use common sense. §8 Thread Titles
Please name your thread appropriately; the subject title should sum up / explain the content in the thread. If you fail to name your thread properly (such as ‘Hey!’ or ‘Check this out!’ or ‘Help!’), we will either rename or lock the topic. Repeated offense may lead to infractions. The practice of using CAPITALS only in your thread title is not allowed and will be edited or the thread will simply be deleted. Strange or abnormal Unicode characters should be excluded from thread titles for the sake of being distracting and unnecessary.
§9 Thread Capitalization
Please ensure that your post is not in all CAPITALS, as this is not allowed. Any threads posted in all caps will subsequently be removed from the forum. Repeated offenses may lead to infractions against your account. This practice is not approved or accepted here.
§10 Images in posts
When posting images, mind the following restrictions:
.gifs will be allowed and may be removed by Staff if deemed necessary.
Maximum size for images is 1280x1024.
Do not include more than ~1 large image per paragraph of text, unless in image collection / announcement threads. Link to further images.
Consider posting thumbnails. You may post a few more images per post if they are reasonably small, the details are for the Moderation to judge. §11 The use of BBCode
It is allowed to use the BBCode in your posts. Over usage is not allowed. You may use the Bold in a reasonable manner but not for the whole text body. You may use the size feature but in a limited reasonable manner. You may not use any of the additional fonts at all. Color may be used to high light a point but again, not for the whole text body. Moderators will be watching for misuse and will edit when required without giving notice. Continued disregard for this rule will result in Moderator action in the form of warnings. §12 Complaints of Server/Admin Abuse Reports of server/admin abuse will not be posted publicly. All reports concerning this type of behavior should be place in the appropriate sub-forum. http://forums.joinsquad.com/forum/241-report-server-admin-abuse/ All posts made outside of this area will be be removed. Section II: Reporting & Moderation §1 Reporting Posts
There is a Post Report system in place. If you notice a post that violates forum rules, simply use the exclamation mark icon below the users avatar image to send a report to the Moderation. We will then review this post. Your report will not be made public and cannot be linked to your person by anyone outside of the Squad Team. You will not be punished for using the Report system even if the report was false, unless you repeatedly abuse the system to spam it.
Do not ‘report’ posts by replying directly in public to them. In case of spambots, this prompts them to respond in turn, spamming the forum further. This also fuels flame wars and arguments. §2 Reporting Moderators
Moderators are subject to the same forum rules (and some additional rules / exceptions). If you think that a Moderator has treated you unfairly or is otherwise breaking forum rules, please PM the Lead Moderator or any Administrator. Do not accuse Moderators in public, the Squad Team will treat every complaint seriously and it is in our interest to discipline or remove Moderators who are known to break forum rules. §3 Respect Squad Team members and Moderators
Do not ignore or argue against Admin, Moderator or Dev instructions on the forum. If you have a complaint, as per §2, please inform the Team in private. You are expected to follow orders given by the Moderation, Administration and Development Team, and it is necessary for smooth running of the forum to respect their decisions. Being stubborn or ignoring warnings will lead to harsher punishments - however, we do not tolerate Moderator / Admin abuse of power / privileges, so do not hesitate to inform other Team members if you feel treated unfairly. §4 Bans and multiple accounts
If your account is temporarily or permanently banned, do NOT create another account. Bypassing a ban will result in further action, and a permanent ban of all of your accounts.
You are not allowed to have more than one account for any reason. If you share an internet connection with another user who has their own account, it might happen that this account is incorrectly identified as a secondary account - please get in touch with the Moderation or Administration to resolve such issues.
Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'Objectives'.
Found 6 results
Recommendation: Analyze this suggestion from a more holistic perspective. (Updated) I believe I may have a solution that would optimize the game a bit further and would definitely be more enjoyable for everyone. A) Multiple Spawn Areas: Preferably three(varies on maps & game-modes) - I suggest having an Optional: Aerial-Support base being able to be destroyed, disabled or Capturable. Main base: logistics, transport For: Squad leaders, Infantry Offensive Vehicle Base = t72, stryker, 30mm For: Crewman Kit, Engineer kit Aerial-support main-base = helicopter, drones, air-strikes. For: Commander roles, and Helicopter Pilot roles. B) Settings/System Requirements: I believe that very few actually use the motion blur so I think we should remove that and the low settings while keeping only the medium to epic settings. I also believe that we should update Requirements by replacing the "Minimum Requirement" with our current "Recommended Requirement'. Settings: Remove All Low settings and Cinematic Shadow = Medium, High, and Epic only. Remove: Distance Shadow Foliage = Medium, High, and Epic only. Remove: All Low Settings System Requirements: Ram Must be: 16gb Ram or higher GPU Must be: GTX 970 or higher CPU Must be: i5-2550k or higher C) Game-play: Ticket bleed changes Troops: Commanders cost = 8 ticket bleed Squad Leaders cost = 4 tickets bleed Normal Infantry cost = 1 ticket bleed Vehicles: Logistics, Transport cost = 15 tickets bleed Small artillery Vics cost = 20 tickets bleed Medium artillery Vics cost = 25 ticket bleed Heavy Battle Tanks cost = 30 tickets bleed Aerial(Helicopter) cost = 30 tickets bleed Deployable/Flags: Radios cost = 30 tickets bleed Captured objectives = 40 tickets bleed I would love to hear some feedback from the community as well, let me know what you think about these suggestions. Will you guys enjoy this more, will it be worse, and please be specific as to why you would disagree/agree. Thanks.
I know Squad is just following the same formula of the original Project Reality right now. The Insurgency game mode makes sense and is original but Advance and Secure (AAS) is pretty much a derivative of the original conquest mode from the Battlefield games. In my opinion, the game mode doesn't feel realistic and camping a bunch of zones just to get more tickets or bleed the enemies tickets doesn't feel impactful to the player. The original Project Reality had a game mode called Command and Control and I'd like to see something of that sort return back in Squad. I would also like to share my own suggestions for game modes which are more realistic and would be more entertaining than AAS. Ideas for Game Modes: Blitzkrieg This game mode features battles that give the advancing team more and more tools to give their enemies problems. In order to win the match, you have to turn the tide of the battle. Each team has the ability to capture radar towers, generators, ammo depots and one super weapon on the map. When a team has more objectives under their control. They receive more supplies and assets. These can come in the form of ordnance, vehicles or supplies. For example, more vehicles will respawn at your main base if more of these are under your teams control. Radar towers have a AOE of effect on the map that reveal enemy vehicles. Perhaps the team who doesn't control these towers may lack the ability to capture and hold them. They may opt to instead just destroy them with sneaky infantry squad missions. Generators power the radar towers. The generators would have to be functional for radar towers to work and can be disrupted by the enemy team. The generators temporarily disabling the radar towers would offer the disadvantaged team some breathings space and a chance to get back into the game. The generators should be easy to shut down from a presence of infantry at the control room of them, but they could also be destroyed from ordnance that can do it. Ammo depots give your team more supplies and allows fobs to become stronger when constructed, their supplies will be higher when being newly built. They will have the ability to construct more dangerous FOB's. Ammo depots could be destroyed setting off a large explosion. The super weapon will be a 155mm Artillery station. It has several batteries which the team can use against another. These can also be destroyed and the battery cannot be moved. The team who doesn't control as many objectives should feel overwhelmed as the other team gets more and more. This mode is similar to AAS but features more realistic objectives which would make sense for real military's to capture. This post is just a example of how objectives can be more realistic rather than feeling gamey.
From the very beginning I have been asking for a change in the mechanics of how objectives work. I do not approve of the "majority rules" system we currently have. I do not think that a strategic objective should be won or lost solely based on the number of people within its "radius". It detracts from good gameplay in my opinion. It does not favor good positioning. It does not favor proactive patrolling. It does not enhance a small but well coordinated defence. There is a youtube video in that link. Please watch it and explain to me exactly what those guys are guarding. Sure, within the current mechanics they have secured the objective. But do we really want gameplay to devolve to that? Abusing mechanics to win? I'm not saying that what they did is impossible to counter. In fact, as others have pointed out the tactics with an organized squad would be quite simple and net many kills and a huge ticket loss on the enemy. My point is, what if instead of having to just "be in the zone" they actually had to defend a physical, tangible, interact-able object such as a flag pole in the middle of that compound? I get it, someone's going to say, "but then can't a marksman just stand off at 600 meters and keep shooting people as they try to raise their flag?" Sure they can, but isn't the point of capturing an objective to secure the area? If there are still threats in the vicinity then capping should be dangerous. At the same time, smokes and suppressing fire can be employed to allow that soldier to raise his team's flag. On the flip side, should objectives not be able to be held with smaller forces? Why should we lose our objective in the rear because we left five guys to defend it but you snuck up with nine and capped it from them without firing a shot? What if instead your nine guys had to get to that flag in the middle of a compound? Slowly creep up and clear it room by room, corner by corner to make sure its clear and you can cap it safely. This is all my personal opinion and feelings. Too many times on Chora I have led grunts against Russians to take market place and they have held the police station south of the road and we have taken the village north of the road and captured the point because we stacked up more guys in the village than they could bring up. Also, not hating on Karm or anyone. I just see egregious abuse of what is in my mind a horrible mechanic. TL:DR change the objective capture radius to instead be a single interact-able object to dictate ownership of the objective.
Does anyone else think a harder game mode would make the game better? If you couldn't respawn until the next round, how much more careful would you be? If anyone has ever played socom you know exactly what I'm talking about. Another game mode where you have to protect 3 Vip's from being killed by Insurgents, Or where Multiple squads are trying to rescue 3 Vip's from the insurgents. You either work together to complete the objective, or you all die trying. Playing socom you would be in a match with 3 or 5 rounds and the best 3 out of 5 would be the winning team. I don't know I just think that would be pretty damn sweet, for the serious players at least. That would make the need for teamwork greater as well.
The manual states that after all of the flags are held by one team the other team will start bleeding tickets at a rate of one per second. So far in my experience this is not true. Played a match earlier tonight on Fool's Road where we were able to capture all three objectives in about 15 minutes. While I don't mind that the game didn't end pretty much immediately I don't understand why it lasted about a half hour longer. Also experienced this Saturday on Kohat Toi after my team lost all the objectives we suffered from our main being spawn camped for about ten minutes before the match ended. I know, we sucked but thats what happens sometimes when you join a match halfway through and no one else knows how FOBs are made. Anyway, am I just experiencing bugs or was ticket bleed removed or changed?
This isnt a suggestion, but I'm interested in the discussion. Is there any merit to the consideration of making a capture points'/control points' status subject to a fog of war? It could certainly complicate things, but in real life you don't get blinking notifications when enemies enter a specific zone of a battlefield. Would there be a simple way that would augment gameplay to include a means to allow stealthy behind-the-lines destabilization of territory control? Something that would call for a patrol or occasional status check of control points? I get the feeling this could easily over-complicate things, and it certainly may not mesh with existing game-play focus, but it would augment the value of flanking maneuvers greatly. I think its worth discussing. Your thoughts?