Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About nstr_tj

  • Rank
    Fireteam Leader

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
  1. Where do you live ill show you when its ready! lol
  2. There is a lot of your post that I dont agree with or incorrect and to save time and to be nice, ill hold it. You do realize that telling me I cant have absolutes is....applying absolutes? I did it because you have to set boundaries or else the discussion has no form. I asked 3 questions to be solved and for people to stop saying to leave it alone. We have roughly 5 brand new ideas that we could further discuss at a later time. Im not sure why you have to feel the need to waste so much energy typing that out and provided next to nothing in terms of good content to perhaps revamp an old system. Or feel the need to talk to me like im some little kid. You see this is why im so upset!! I appreciate the olive branch and its all good. Again per my request, refrain from any posts that do not positively generate NEW ideas. A toggle is not what im talking about, that does not solve the name over head. I'm looking for an idea/system that still incorporates the feeling of having to actually look at someone to IFF. Just like my squad on the hill scenario I posted a while back. That is what I'm looking to get at. I'm not shooting it down it's just that you didn't answer the question. And about Unfrial's post. Sir I apprecaite what you wrote and maybe didnt make it obvious. In a nutshell, the resolution of the screen in my mind, shouldn't have that much of an impact to IFF to have floating names. If someone is too far for you to see, you would instinctively would want to move up yes? If a floating name is there you wouldn't. That's one example of how it impacts your decision and risk taking process.
  3. Thanks man and welcome to the proper discussion side! Yeah the scoreboard thing gets people heated for some reason in my view. Why do people want to know your score in game? I wholeheartedly believe it makes it really arcadey. Still in PR as i mentioned before you can still tell after you spawn if you got that sniper off in the distance. All side points go to a squad wide pool that shows up at the end perhaps? An after action report screen showing total team kills, shots fired, deaths and maybe some cool other ones? Yeah being able to reload while crawling just looks too weird to me! What does he have super strong legs? haha Edit: I forgot to say that ill log your +1's and suggestions.
  4. Nah, we're just getting started. A few pretty new good ideas have came up of it so if you arent here to participate than leave please. You could have messaged me this. I asked that you not post what you did so why would you do it?
  5. See now this is what im talking about! Thanks man for contributing seriously. I like your ADS suggestion for sure. That gives pretty good balance to a realistic shooter. The audio clues easily could help bridge the balance as well. I like it!
  6. Please delete this. Not only is it against my multiple requests, I'm trying to get a good debate going. Please stop trolling.
  7. TJeezey, on 10 Sept 2015 - 3:30 PM, said: Oh snap I figured out how to multi-quote now! How else am I supposed to say that!? I literally said not being mean at all as the second sentence. I have actually made up multiple serious suggestions and fixes so I'm not sure how I'm beating a dead horse. Im not sure you know what that saying means... Again someone SANE please read my post and see the immediate hate to a whole thread because of my views on nametags? I have some good shit in there and asked people to not post what you have done multiple times already. Now THAT is beating a dead horse. -TJeezey out (that means no more communication with you. You've been nothing but abusive.
  8. Lol I can understand that. New topic: Figure out a new word for immersion. Haha
  9. Please please please I ask a sane person to look at my ENTIRE post. You can clearly see how I disliked the nametags, made suggestions on what i DID NOT WANT in the game (not take out of the game) but posed questions on improvements. The only thing you could have perceived as confrontational is me saying how much I disliked VoodooButtPirate bouncing on my screen when I'm trying to get hooked in the immersion. I stated I didn't want posts on how its been tried before or whatever excuse people still want to use. I asked pretty nicely I thought to pose friendly suggestions on improving VoodooButtPirate. Now look at what my replies to those were? Any normal person would get pissed that people are literally doing the exact opposite of the OP. You could then see me get more irate the more it happened. Then people throwing out lies that I said (which I'm not sure why when you can go back and look?). Seriously look at the replies and tell me what you would do? Is the must have for nametags to know if a guy next to you is a bad guy or not that great in this community? I'm honestly asking nicely because it's a big deal for me. Edit: Please please save the its been tried before, close thread. Not only did I ask not for those posts but thats been said before right??
  10. Yes that was an assumption but was posted after his assumption post. Thanks for the answers to the OP!
  11. No no no. If you're going to slander me than stop acting like a baby and say you messed up.
  12. Whats your call of duty gamertag?
  13. Still waiting for all of my absolutes and assumptions... He says lies and you like it? Eww why?
  14. I suck at web editing. Again thanks for the suggestions and positive improvements to the OP's questions!