Jump to content

Stom

Member
  • Content count

    786
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Stom

  1. The Wrench -- February 2019

    Lots of awesome stuff! It's a mod my man, you don't need to touch it.
  2. What does this game do better than PR?

    My favorite thing is the massive improvements to general player interaction. Moving through the environment with movement speeds and the vaulting systems is a pleasure. Gunplay is responsive and reliable. The radial menus work well (expect for the vehicle one glitching a bit). There are a few elements like suppression and vehicle handling which need to be further improved in Squad but I still prefer the direction they're heading away from PR.
  3. Insurgency Panzer IV

    At the moment Insurgents are also getting the T-62. If any WW2 tank were to be added to the game I would think a T-34 would suit better because it's actually still in service with some third world countries and was supplied everywhere at the beginning of the cold war.
  4. Redeploy From Main Base

    I think a lot of players don't really mind the idea of taking an empty logi back to main, what they don't want is to become the 'logi-guy' because once they get back there's not much to do but either kill themselves and wait one and half minutes or continue doing logi runs for the whole game.
  5. Redeploy From Main Base

    This suggestion has come up a few times and I'm absolutely for it. Whenever I'm in a squad that places a slightly risky FOB to assault an objective we end up either leaving the Logi somwhere out of the way, then if the assault goes badly we've lost it, or destroying it. Having one person return the logi and redeploy would be a perfect solution in my eyes.
  6. January 2019 Recap

    This is something that keeps coming up that doesn't make much sense to me. The game has the same game modes, kit system, squad system and even some of the same maps from PR. It is thematically and structurally the same, it has fulfilled the promise of being a spiritual successor. I personally don't care much for flyable aircraft and have been in favour of more realistically moving call-ins from the start but I can sympathise with people who were excited to fly. To my mind Squad has turned into about 80% of what was promised in the kickstarters and I'm satisfied with that because they've been transparent enough with their reasoning for letting some features go.
  7. January 2019 Recap

    They are still working on choppers but it's not a matter of just pouring more man power on it. It is a combined arms game and choppers are a single aspect, BMPs and T-62s are going to bring a lot of balancing and interesting elements to the known aspects of the game. Who knows what choppers will do.
  8. January 2019 Recap

    I am so excited to play with all that new armour, and ammo granularity is sorely needed. I think that might just be the end of a gun run.
  9. Squad is dead or not ?

    People often use "it's an alpha/beta" as a shield against criticism but I think a lot of this "wack-a-mole" of mechanics is just the reality of Early Access development rather than MilSim vs Arcade fighting one another. The challenge Squad faces is that it's a team based shooter that has to be balanced, but hasn't finalised any of it's key features and that's where this constant reshuffling comes from, not the genre. For me personally Squad plays better than it has in any version before, there are some who prefer some older mechanic versions like the V9 aiming controls and even those that preferred the game without vehicles. People will come and go, but to my mind Squad has maintained it's balance of arcade and milsim really well during development and is filling a void in the market quite well. Whether there is a massive playerbase waiting to find and fill that void or not is pretty irrelevant at the moment since there's plenty of sales to fuel development and always servers that are full. When the game stops making money or can't fill servers that's when it'll be time to worry, not at the moment.
  10. Everyone wants to see the HUMVEE return in some iteration but my guess is that it would need substantial remodelling to properly avoid any legal trouble and that's just not worthwhile when there's so many other vehicles that would have a greater affect on gameplay for those resources to be dedicated towards. I agree that the vehicle has enough differences in role to make it valuable to the game compared with the M-ATV but not to take priority over something like a BMP, Challenger or helicopter which would use the same artists.
  11. Interactive IEDs

    Didn't know that but it's exactly what I'm suggesting. In Squad it would have a greater tactical benefit than I image it has in Sandstorm since there's armoured vehicles.
  12. Kept thinking on this idea rather than sleeping so here it is. I propose that when an IED is placed it becomes an interactive item with a radial menu like the Rifleman's ammo bag, rather than being immediatley armed and ready to be detonated. The options on the IED would be something like these: - Pick up: Everyone can do this, including enemy. For the scout the IED would go back into their equipment slot but all other kits would carry it in their hands until dropped. - Arm/Disarm: Only scouts can do this, and potentially an engineer/EOD type kit for conventional forces. - Set detonation phone number: Only the scout that placed the IED. Coupled with this, the phone detonator item would be changed so it would open a different radial menu like the Squad/Fireteam leader command menu. This menu would have three separate detonation 'phone numbers', which for ease of use should just be the last three numbers of a phone number (eg. **** *** 092). When you select one of these numbers it dials and detonates any IED set to that number. There is also the potential to share numbers between Scouts using this menu, but that's not particularly important for the suggestion. So why do this? Simply put, the IED is the most interesting and powerful piece of equipment for the Irregular forces, and given their current relatively weak performance compared to the conventional forces it's prime time to push their assymetric strengths further. This would also give the IED the ability to be carried and detonated. This would avoid the potential for certain countries to take legal action against the game because there would be no OWI created suicide vest in the game, but if players decide to use an innovative tactic with the game mechanics, so be it. There's also smaller details about IEDs that could be improved and expanded, like exploding when hit by another explosion or having counter-IED kits like an Engineer or EOD tech. Let me know what you think.
  13. Interactive IEDs

    That's a large part of the reason I made this suggestion, both Rising Storm and Battlefield allow players to do it through mechanics but don't have specific weapons or kits to do it, which is what I am suggesting. Insurgency Sandstorm doesn't allow players to play as suicide bombers, those are only AI in the coop mode. I think all of these games don't have explicit player controlled suicide bombing to avoid the potential legal or publicity issues but the practical result is players can still do it as a tactic. IEDs can currently be destroyed by anyone with a shovel. I am just suggesting that the engineer kit, which is already in the test branch, has it's capability expanded to disarm IEDs. Coupled with this IEDs should no longer be destroyed by shovels so only Sappers/Engineers can disarm them adding value to those kits and increasing the threat of IEDs. Setting numbers would allow Sappers better control and versatility with how they use IEDs and if you find it too complicated and don't want to work with those mechanics it would work the same way it does now where all IEDs are bound to a single default number. From a reasonable standpoint as someone that plays the game I agree. But the players who are already in the community aren't the people that would cause a fuss. You and I see it as a game that represents real world tactics but there are many people in positions of power that just see games as romantic escapism so when they hear that a game set in the modern day let's you play as a suicide bomber against real world countries they think it's 'training terrorists' no matter the context. You might remember all the media fuss that resulted from someone making a mod that had an ISIS faction in Arma 3, which was always intended as an opfor faction. It's funny that just after I posted this the test branch updated with an Engineer class for each conventional faction that has explosives and a vehicle repair kit. So if IEDs were overhauled that class would get the ability to deal wit them.
  14. Interactive IEDs

    Well if you know some trends from recent years you'll notice that a few major countries such as Germany, China and Australia have banned a few games for various reasons, from drug use to gore, so it wouldn't be surprising if they did take action against a game that lets you play as a suicide bomber. There's also the Medal of Honor reboot that caused a huge amount of media fuss by naming one of thier multiplayer factions Taliban which they quickly undid, while that's not the exact same situation you can see connecting threads. What I've proposed isn't any more clunky than using an ammo bag, and if you've seen the recent playtest version of the game there is already an engineer class that has explosives and a repair kit, so they wouldn't be dedicated to anit-IED but rather an addition to their role.
  15. Javelins are a tricky thing to balance for sure but the devs have stated many times in the past that they want to have as few vehicle one hit kills as possible I'm not too worried about it ruining vehicles. With Component damage being expanded I'm expacting the Javelin will mainly damage components like turrets and ammo rather than outright destroy vehicles. There's also some potential systems like thermal vision for vehicles that will make conventional faction vehicles stronger and mean a fire-and-forget HAT isn't quite as powerful by comparison, this would mean that irregulars wouldn't have thermals that make up for the Javelin but I think it's fair to say irregulars aren't ever going to have strong vehicles when facing conventional factions. I don't think Squad is interested in that sort of really specific level of realism, though the idea of only firing it when crouched could be alright. Having an extremely high ammo cost would be enough for me, something like 500-750 ammo points would mean you're not getting the Javelin constantly hitting every vehicle on the map. That's pretty much what I want except I was trying to design it with the current limitations of the kit system in mind. Talking to some people on Discord the perfect system would have individual pieces of equipment that have kit and squad/team size restrictions rather than the whole kit change system we have now, then you would customise your utility items based on need.
  16. Vehicle balance is a bit of a sore subject at the moment but whatever your thoughts I think it is a perfect time to look at changing the current infantry anti-tank kits and how they're distributed. What I suggest is that LAT is moved from Fire Support to a single direct combat role and a single new Medium Anti-tank (MAT) role takes it's place in Fire Support. This suggestion also assumes that the Javelin is made ready to replace the current US/GB HAT kit with the AT-4 being reverted to pre-buff power and the TBG-7V Thermobaric RPG-7 rocket is ready. The faction Infantry Anti-Tank roles would be roughly as follows: US/UK Combat Roles -LAT(1 per squad): 1 LAW and 1 Frag Grenade. Fire Support Roles -MAT(1 per squad): 1 AT4 and 1 Frag Grenade. -HAT(1 per team): 1 Javelin. Russia Combat Roles -LAT(1 per squad): RPG-26 and 1 Frag grenade. Fire Support Roles -MAT(1 per squad): RPG-7 with optic, 1 HEAT rocket and 1 Thermobaric Rocket OR RPG-7 with optic, 2 HEAT rocket and 1 Frag Rocket. -HAT(2 per team, 1 per squad): 1 RPG-7 with optic, 1 Tandem HEAT rocket, 1 HEAT Rocket and 1 Frag Rocket. Militia Combat Roles -LAT(1 per squad): RPG-7, 1 HEAT rocket and 2 Frag Rockets. Fire Support Roles -MAT(1 per squad): RPG-7, 2 HEAT rocket, 1 Frag Rockets and 1 Thermobaric Rocket. -HAT(2 per team, 1 per squad): RPG-7, 1 Tandem HEAT Rocket, 1 Heat Rocket and 2 Frag Rockets. Insurgents Combat Roles -LAT same as Militia Fire Support Roles -MAT same as Militia -HAT(2 per team, 1 per squad): Same as Militia OR 1 RPG-29, 2 tandem HEAT Rockets. These loadouts aren't well developed but hopefully they convey the point. While this does appear to give US/GB less anti-armour power keep in mind that Russian/Soviet vehicles are mostly lighter than their NATO counterparts. I think these changes would make squad compisitions more interesting by freeing one of the fire support slots and would give infantry a little more capability to engage armour without shifting the balance in their favour too dramatically. Let me know what you think.
  17. Please read the post.
  18. I did mention the javelin for US/UK HAT. I'm not suggesting there should be any one hit kills for infantry, just slightly more capability and some more varied kits. The actual loadouts for kits don't matter as much for this suggestion since they'll come down to testing, what is more important is freeing up a fire-support role for other kits to be chosen in vehicle heavy maps.
  19. Teleport from main base?

    You can already spawn at main, rearm then respawn which undermines the system. I agree something should be done to fix that little exploit but my suggestion isn't the instant teleport the OP suggests, but a reduced spawn timer and no ticket loss might encourage more players to secure abandoned vehicles. An easy way around redeploy being abused in that way is make it so it's unavailable until 120 seconds or so after spawning, so it's left for the people who have driven in or those who really did accidentally spawn. I'm not arguing this because I can't bare the thought of a 90 second wait, my issue with the current system is the player who goes to the effort of helping their team by driving a vehicle back to main so others can use it is penalised and I think that shouldn't be the case.
  20. Teleport from main base?

    Absolutley but I tihnk there's some important differences like not costing a ticket since you're already at main and still having a respawn timer. That's not the reality of what is happening. Besides, often a logi will get ambushed then at some point an infantry Squad, who are not related to the squad who originally drove it out, will secure the empty vehicle and people don't want to go to the effort of driving all the way back to main then respawning for 90 seconds or catching a ride back. I don't see the issue with this system given main already has a no-fire zone and is nowhere near anything, so it wouldn't be somehow abused, and the current system just encourages the same thing using respawn except the player who goes to the effort of helping their team is penalised.
  21. Teleport from main base?

    I've seen the suggestion a few times in the past that there should be a 'Redeploy' station somewhere at main. This wouldn't be the same as a teleport, all it would do is send you back to the spawn screen with the minimum spawn time and without costing a ticket. The main advantage of this system is that it would allow people to drop off vehicles or for those who accidentally spawn on main to get back into the game using an existing system without penalising themselves with a long spawn timer or the team by losing a ticket.
  22. Iranian Army's Ground Forces (Faction Idea)

    I've always been keen on the idea of adding Iran over a fictional MEC type faction given we've already got Russia, UK and US represented. I agree with @Brightnight about having the G3 and AK as a choice for rifleman and SL. It'll serve to make the faction a little more interesting, especially with that KL-7 variant for visual separation from the irregulars. Given the way optics for the Russians are handled in game I think we could get a few more than realistic for Iran to make up for the general technological disadvantage of the faction. Coupling this with the G3s would mean there would be a lot of pseudo-marksmen which might be interesting, inversely it could just be annoying but who knows. Making it as a mod faction has crossed my mind a few times but since I've already got my modding plate full I won't be able to tackle it.
  23. Tanks for Insurgents and Milita?

    Based on what I've seen Insurgents will get a T-62 and Militia will get an older version of a T-72 with maybe a few T-62s to supplement.
  24. please do not release this patch

    I disagree with pretty much all of your negative points. 1) While my experience with the gunplay isn't perfect because I've been playing with 400+ ping what I have played with I like. I'm not a competitive player but I'm still able to keep my aim on target and get hits, but with enough of a challenge that it still feels rewarding and weighty. 2) There was a glitch where players were invisible that might be the reason for your ghost problem. The actual suppression works pretty well in my opinion. It's a small enough effect that it doesn't feel like you're losing control but enough of an impact to impede accurate fire at long ranges which makes suppressive fire a viable tactic. 3) I think the reasoning ammo isn't automatically resupplied when you spawn at a HAB is if the FOB is also doing something important like resupplying a tank or ATGM you don't want to have everybody that spawns missing a couple grenades draining the resources. Apart from that slight annoyance I think the persistent ammo system is extremely effective at heightening the importance of logistics and coordination from the squad level up. It also helps to make vehicles a lot more effective because the LAT can't just die and respawn constantly to go hunting again. 4) The HAB changes work really well to remedy the meatgrinder of V11 but whether or not they're too dramatic is a bit hard to tell at this point. It will definitely mean players will have to be more careful with FOB placement and given that FOB proximity requirements have been reduced and logitruck capacity increased it's easier to place more of them. 5) I know some people have issue with the M4 sound being unrealistic but the sounds overall have improved especially when it comes to heavy weapons like the M2 distance sounds. The small arms sound a bit more punchy overall which I enjoy. Even though I love tanks and the visual improvements all of these mechanical changes are what makes V12 exciting for me.
  25. Arcady Milsim? Suggestions.

    That's not really a reasonable request. You'd be creating two different branches of the game that would require their own development and support. Especially given that Squad is still in Early Access it doesn't really work from a developmental standpoint. Also, this would split the playerbase. While this is an argument that has been brought up against modding I feel if it were two official branches of the game they would be far more disruptive to communities.
×