Jump to content

Iron

Member
  • Content count

    483
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Iron


  1. On 10/15/2016 at 7:25 PM, Skul said:

    @MultiSquid

    Battlefield 2 is one of the best games ever made in numan history, that's for sure. Without Battlefield 2 they wouldn't make PR and Squad itself.

     

    What you're saying, it's like saying that Terminator 2 led to Terminator 3 and therefore Terminator 2 is a bad movie(Terminator 2 is one of the best movies ever made in human history).

     

    It doesn't matter if Squad has 4 years in it or not. At some point of time it will and even if game will be the same in 4 years, people will play it completely differently compared to the current moment.

    Couldn't disagree more.  It was the game that started the downward spiral that is the Battlefield franchise.  BF42 and BFV were the first and last great games.  Not to take away from Bad Company.  That was good also.  


  2. On 9/24/2016 at 5:19 PM, MultiSquid said:

    ... or we could remove the score altogether.

     

     

    Best idea ever.  

     

    Every single one of these threads that get started the same conversations take place.  This is where I say that scoring is stupid and that the only thing that matters is Wins and Loses.  These are pointless threads. 


  3. I'm good without stats and rankings but there seems to be a lot of people in the inner circle dropping hints there will be.  /sadface

     

    I play Squad because it offers me something different.  But I also enjoy Insurgency, Day of Infamy, RO2, ARMA3.

     

     


  4. On 4/27/2016 at 11:04 PM, Mumble said:

    I agree, I would love to see the way gameplay changes if the respawn timer is made longer. The thought of players actually slowing down because they don't want to wait to spawn is great!

     

    I know it's alpha, so everything is subject to change, but I think the spawn times could go from what they are now (30 seconds average on FOBs?) to two, three times their current value (60-90 seconds for FOB spawn). It would also increase the incentive to wait for a medic and play closer with your squad so your medic has a better chance to get to you. As it is now, you can run willy nilly around and get a few fun kills, die, and respawn in 20 seconds.

     

    (sorry if I've repeated any points, I didn't read the six pages of comments)

    Do you want to kill game play?  Because honestly 60 sec is much too long.  All your doing with a long timer is keeping people from either playing because they got shot or in the background building a mega FOB because they're scared to fight and die.  

     

    On 4/27/2016 at 11:48 PM, Lethargo said:

    Long story short: Coming from Arma, I think supp. fire in SQUAD is a joke. It needs a big buff so it actually works.

    All too often I see people returning fire accurately while being suppressed. And that hurts game play immensely in a game that is about small unit tactics/fire and maneuver.

    Have you never played Squad?  The suppression in the game is perfect and if you don't think so you're not in fire fights.  

     

    To even think there's two more pages to read in this thread is mind numbing.  Can you get this locked?  I'm pretty sure the devs have said they aren't changing it.  If they change their minds then reopen it.  Ugh!


  5. On 8/28/2016 at 5:53 AM, KulaGGin said:

    I've heard that so many times... Some people say that you will not see any difference between 60 Hz and 120 Hz monitors for various reasons like human eye can't see more than 60 FPS per second and other mad bullshit. I can see difference even between 60 and 62 Hz and I can tell in which mode monitor is running at the moment without looking at properties...

     

    Recently in 2016 I've even heard from some kid that there is no any reasons to switch from 120 Hz to a 270 Hz monitor because you will not notice any difference... Some people say there is no difference between 125 Hz and 1000 Hz mouses. Now when you can overclock your USB port up to 8000 Hz people started saying that there is no difference between 1000 Hz and 8000 Hz(kek).

     

    And all people do that because of their arrogance. They either just don't have  the thing to test(like 270 Hz monitor), so they say there is no difference between or they just wasn't able to properly configure it(like 5.1 system), so they say there is no difference or even that their worse system(like stereo vs 5.1) is better.

    Arrogance nor ignorance has anything to do with this.  You're also comparing apples and fricking oranges.  I most certainly can tell the difference between 60hz and 120hz and even 144hz while gaming.  But again not even a remotely close comparison.

     

    And if you bothered to actually read what I wrote, I'm not an audiophile and I advised a quality set of headphones over a sound card because with a $40 set from Best Buy the OP will most assuredly NOT see a difference.


  6. The game is terrible.  Definitely not worth the $60.  Probably not even worth $10 at this point.  Star Citizen will be a cross between NMS and EOL.  I think they will have the tech to do it.  Will be interesting to see.


  7. On 8/16/2016 at 6:23 PM, lawnboy said:

    I've been playing Darkest Hour mod for the original Red Orchestra. It may be old and ugly but it has some of the best realism based combined arms gameplay. And it's got a ton of maps and vehicles. 

     

    Plus it doesn't crash and run like a turd, so that's a huge plus!

    I love Red Orchestra.  God I haven't played that in forever.  

     

    To the OP .... I play the hell out of Squad.  Quite a few people do from the look of the server list.  Hahaha


  8. 13 hours ago, Psyrus said:

     

    Thankfully the game hasn't been released yet, we're still in the Alpha phase where some people bought in to play during the "early access" period, which helps the developers by allowing what is essentially mass-stress-testing and gather community feedback about performance and feature direction in the game, where they so please. :)

    Technically it is released.  

     

    I'd prefer 50v50 but having vehicles is a nice change of pace.  


  9. 3 hours ago, fatalsushi said:

    Really? You're implying that people who don't post on audiophile forums won't distinguish the difference anyway? From what I read, there's quite a big difference between on-board and otherwise but I wanted to confirm that here.

    There's not really any noticeable difference.  OP should invest in a quality set of headphones instead of a sound card.  IMHO  

     

    Disclaimer:  I'm not an audiophile.  Just speaking from personal experience and what I've read.


  10. 1 hour ago, KulaGGin said:

    I'd definitely like that one if I could.

     

    I usually change team when I hear something like that from some schoolsport. I mean, I'm sure that guy who told you that you can **** off and strart your own squad was about ~18 years old and his voice hadn't even broken yet. After the end of the round I just troll them in chat. Arrogant selfish overconfident haughty kids like that usually leave after they get rekt and trolled in chat.

     

     

     

    To be honest I'll give people attitude also if they don't like how I run my squad so that whole ~18 thing you just said, you can keep that to yourself.  

×