Jump to content

jackU543

Member
  • Content count

    11
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About jackU543

  • Rank
    Fireteam Leader
  1. I notice there is a change of ACOG magnification in one mounted on the L85A2, it seem to be much weaker than the one mounted on the M4 ? Is its some kind of bug or official gameplay change ? In this picture here you can see the M4 ACOG ( on the right side ) can seen as far as 750m and have no trouble seeing at 500m at all and in the L85A2 ACOG ( left side ) the view become blurry at about 500m The same thing also happened in the SUSAT, I compare the sight to it equivalent 1P29 sight and there is a big different in magnification power between the two despite they both 4x sights
  2. Alpha 12.1 Released

    US for now probably become the best faction in game, best optic, good rifle, and a wide variety of armored & heavy armored support
  3. Alpha 12.1 Released

    I notice there is a change of ACOG magnification in one mounted on the L85A2, it seem to be much weaker than the one mounted on the M4 ? Is its some kind of bug or official gameplay change ? In this picture here you can see the M4 ACOG ( on the right side ) can seen as far as 750m and have no trouble seeing at 500m at all and in the L85A2 ACOG ( left side ) the view become blurry at about 500m
  4. Giving that the L85A2 is pretty heavy gun compare to other in-game rifle using intermediate round, i think the recoil on the rifle should be much more controllable compare to the M4, not bounce left and right every shot taken
  5. Giving the l85A2 new iron-sight

    why would there alway have to be at least one ****ing dude that alway against everyone opinion ? Maybe you actually are a member of a dev team
  6. Giving the l85A2 new iron-sight

    giving all BAF infantry an ability to used a SUSAT mounted rifle wouldn t be much of a balanced issue since the SUSAT wouldn t be comparable to other high end optic like the ACOG or 1p78. We've seen the widespread used of the SUSAT before in V11 test server, not sure why the dev changed it.
  7. Giving the l85A2 new iron-sight

    if you said that, then why don t the dev give us a fcking red dot sight mount on top of an optic ? Or enable us to use the back up iron sight on the ACOG like in Arma 3, or at least let people to choose what they want agree with you
  8. Giving the l85A2 new iron-sight

    if they want to strive for accuracy, then every BAF infantry should have an optic equipped L85, but since it would make the game so unbalanced, as the dev said. But then what i proposed is just giving the weapon new iron-sight so the weapon can be equal to other in-game rifle.
  9. Giving the l85A2 new iron-sight

    the game is already inaccurate in depicting BAF so giving a hybrid L85, cadet rifle wouldn t be much of a problem anyway.
  10. Giving the l85A2 new iron-sight

    well, did you really read what i wrote ? I said the only part needed to changed is an iron-sight, not a whole rifle
  11. Right now the inability to ranged above 200m make it very difficult for an average player like me to get a better shot at long range with the L85A2, this also make the gun in a big disadvantage compare to other rifles in game. I think the devs should replaced the current l85a2 iron-sight with the one used in the cadet version, which allow for range adjustment up to 500m ( L98A1 )
×