Jump to content

Rybec

Member
  • Content count

    843
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Rybec

  • Rank
    Company Commander

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Canada
  • Interests
    I like firearms and video games.
    https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCyC16-ZKXI7I-cahuekV48A

Recent Profile Visitors

1,368 profile views
  1. How should armoured vehicles be used?

    Tanks should be a reactionary thing until the other enemy armor is taken out, then there's a lot more breathing room. APCs/IFVs should be with(ish) the infantry to give them some extra kick while the infantry is screening for the vehicles. I completely disregard someone's opinion that thinks armor should be getting right into a town to get attention off the infantry. The thing gets tracked and all the sudden you've lost the vehicle entirely when it gets killed off with a HAT and now you're out a vehicle.
  2. Player to Enemy Interactions

    So beyond the idea of getting everyone to play along, what would be the gameplay bonuses? In PR if a Blufor guy somehow managed to ziptie an insurgent they'd get a huge boost to intel for the insurgency mode. So in Squad, what would be the reason to surrender? If you die you lose a ticket, but if you surrender and get captured with your idea you die and give the enemy a bonus? Why not just fight to the end like normal in that case?
  3. Add Named Points or Map Text

    We already have a system for putting markers on the maps which makes it as simple as it needs to be with the kinds of people we play with.
  4. HAT Question

    Thermobaric is the "I want to kill people with an explosive fireball that rips their lungs apart" warhead. Anti-infantry only.
  5. I'm going to be a snarky shitter and tell you that the bolt on all the rifles slide.
  6. Data mining

    https://store.steampowered.com/eula/393380_eula_0?eulaLang=english 10. Information Collection & Usage. By installing and using this Multimedia Product, you consent to these information collection and usage terms. If you connect to the Internet when using the Multimedia Product, either through a gaming platform network, or any other method, Licensor may receive information from hardware manufacturers or gaming platform hosts and may automatically collect certain information from your computer or gaming unit. This information may include, but is not limited to, user IDs (such as gamer tags and screen names), game scores, game statistics, game achievements, game performance, locations visited, friends lists, hardware MAC address, internet protocol address, and your usage of various game features. All information collected by Licensor is intended to be anonymous information that does not disclose your identity or constitute personal information, however, if you include personal information (such as your real name) in your user ID, then such personal information will automatically be transmitted to Licensor and used as described herein. The information collected by Licensor may be posted by Licensor on publicly-accessible web sites, shared with hardware manufacturers, shared with platform hosts, shared with Licensor’s marketing partners or used by Licensor for any other lawful purpose. By using this Multimedia Product you consent to the Licensor’s use of related data, including public display of your data such as identification of your user created content or displaying your scores, ranking, achievements and other gameplay data. If you do not want your information shared in this manner, then you should not use the Multimedia Product.
  7. How easy do you think it is to worm yourself through the inside of a tank to the other spots in less than a second?
  8. The Insurgency Force

    They're missing mechanics from PR that made them actually function differently like VBIEDS and civilians. As it is now, you play insurgents as though you got stuck with an optic-less kit on Blufor.
  9. Personally, I think the next faction should be China

    Wew. They were fun in PR though. We need less Blufor and more Opfor that isn't insurgents. Iran or some other PR MEC-like faction would hit the mark perfectly. Once you start getting anywhere other than major nations with their own models of equipment you have a mixed tier of having domestic small arms and imports or contracted productions of either American or Russian vehicles. Japan, Korea, Iran, Former commie bloc countries... They all have their own strange mix.
  10. Fast-roping

    Fast roping has been a running gag since long ago into Project Reality.
  11. What about SVCh?

    Keep in mind the M110 has been in service for nearly a decade now.. The SVDM is used by the Russians ingame and only started being used by the Russian military in the last couple years.
  12. Anti personal Mine for Irregulars.

    Easy. Shovel removes it and prone you can't set off the mine. A careful person can prone, crawl up to the mine, and shovel it away.
  13. Some New Nations Idea

    Something OPFOR. The MEC from PR are a good example. It's a fictional but familiar military with a different feel to how they play. Adding something like them would be a big change if not just for the fact they have battle rifles (G3 variants) as their standard issue gun. More specifically for a named military something like Iran would be cool because they have a mix of Eastern and Western equipment. Also, China. I've posted a few times before how China would be a great faction because they have a very large inventory of Chinese designed and produced equipment making them different from just another Russian-equipped faction.
  14. Neglect and a lack of care

    One day we'll get to run around with our dressed up AK74s.
  15. Why don't you like it? As Geebus says, there are many windows and walls in Squad where you need to stand to shoot over them to get a good angle which ends up putting you in a bad spot for how exposed you are. Lots of walls where a hole is just a bit too high or low to crouch and shoot through. Doesn't have to be a milsim game to want to pick how high or low your stance is.
×