Jump to content

Coletrain

Member
  • Content count

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Coletrain

  • Rank
    Fireteam Leader
  1. Little squads, many vehicles v12.

    On a related note, I really hate people who take 1 tank into a 2 man squad and lock it. On maps with 2 tanks the tanks should work together. What is really ideal is a 9 man squad with a bradley, and 2 tanks. There is no justifiable reason to be splitting the vehicles into separate squads so much, they should be working together.
  2. Looking for a Team? POST HERE

    Name: Coletrain Steam Profile: https://steamcommunity.com/id/coletrain23 Primary Language(s): English Age (optional): 30 Timezone or Region: PST [GMT-8] Nature of Interest: Competitive Gaming Background: I've been playing competitive games my whole life. I'm not interested in any clan who doesn't play aggressively, nor do I care to play with anyone who treats SQUAD more like a milsim than a tactical combined arms shooter. If you get off on micro managing people and having overly strict rules of engagement, I'm not interested. Basically I'm not interested in LARP, and if your main attraction to SQUAD is the milsim aesthetic and not the combined arms teamwork oriented-gameplay, then we're not in the same frame of mind. If you want someone who knows how to tread the fine line between effective aggression and suicidal behaviour, I'm your guy. I love to lead tank squads, especially with competent people who know how to take advantage of terrain and how to out think and outmaneuver the enemy. I'm all about making snap decisions, and not hesitating in the moment. I'm not at all uptight but like to take games seriously, it's actually more fun that way. Status: Unsigned
  3. REWORK THE AMMO BS

    The new ammo system is better in a lot of ways, so I feel this is just revealing that logi runs are a problem more than the new ammo system is a problem. So why have physical logi runs be part of the game if virtually no one enjoys doing it. There has to be a way to abstract logistical resupplies in an automated way, even if it's just a simple resupply timer for now (and maybe AI-driven logis in the future as post release version goal, so supply lines can be threatened as a strategy). I guess some might say this is "dumbing the game down"? I'm not sure about that, all I know is no one wants to do ****ing logi runs or fire mortars when I squad lead. Those two aspects of the game feel like they tread too far into the milsim side of things. Of course I'm going to get knee-jerk negative reaction to this suggestion, but I'm not interested in the musings of forum warriors who always assume me to be some CoD or Battlefield noobie. I played the shit out of both PR and Planetside 1, two of the most teamwork-oriented games ever made. I know what good gameplay is when I see it, and driving a truck playing Military Logistics Simulator 2018 is not it.
  4. I'm having to change my gamma setting depending on the weather and map. Some maps are really really dark and force me to turn my gamma up to 3, and some maps are much better at 1.5 It's especially annoying when getting in any kind of vehicle gun or CROWS system if you had been playing on a darker map before, everything is super over exposed. Often I don't realize this as a tank driver and I'll need to switching to the machine gunner seat and end up having to change my gamma in the middle of combat.
  5. Please Fix the visibility.

    I bought a 31.5'' 1440p monitor. Vision problem solved
  6. Honestly fair point, but concerns of a slippery slope tend to be overplayed in a lot of discussions like this. I just really think both firing mortars and doing logi runs in particular hit a certain threshold where it's just too mil-simmy. Even driving an armored vehicle is far more interesting as you're actually in the fight, and I would argue the driver has by far the most critical role in regards to making the asset effective in combat. Medics, Squad leading, same thing. The difference is, regardless of any tedious aspects of those roles you're still in the fight. I've seen it in all sorts of games where the developer proposes to automate some really tedious aspect of the game and the community flips out accusing the devs of "dumbing the game down", and then after the changes are implemented everyone realizes it was for the better.
  7. I understand where you're coming from but at the same time I've experienced plenty of games where mortars broke a meatgrinder to cap the bleed flag. It's not every game, but such an opportunity happens at least every third game. It really depends on the map/area being fought over. As far as mortars being inaccurate I'm not sure why you think that, if you use a mortar calculator they are extremely accurate. If you locate the enemy HAB, it can be extremely effective at keeping their reinforcements pinned down. Even if it's in a building, a mortar calculator is accurate enough dial in on the building exits and keep the enemy pinned inside. Where mortars really come into play is in games with balanced teams where the battle line shifts a little more slowly, enough time for mortars to dial in on an enemy position. Right now this is pretty rare as the community is constantly being flooded with new players and games tend to be pretty lopsided. In the future as the skill level of the community develops, I think we will see more and more opportunities for mortars to turn the tide of a battle.
  8. I think it would be easier if OWI just designed a waypoint system where SLs can set a path for the A.I. to take, with both "follow road" and "offroad" waypoints.
  9. Mortars are fun for the Forward Observer (SL usually), they are NOT fun for the person firing. Even as a forward observer you're still on the front lines, in the action. You can fight and observe at the same time. Anyone who says actually firing one is fun is on the spectrum, guaranteed. For most people it is AT MOST a novelty the first few times you do it, and from there even those people quickly realize they'd rather be doing pretty much anything else. Even with A.I. you would still have the active role of the forward observer telling the A.I. where to fire. But firing the damn thing? Come on.
  10. On forums you have people defending boring ass jobs like doing logi runs, firing mortars, etc. On forums I hear about how supposedly a lot of people enjoy it. While in reality as a SL it's like pulling teeth trying to get anyone to do this stuff in game, and without indirect fire support the strategic depth of this game is severely limited as defensive positioning becomes overpowered. Quite frankly I'm sick and tired of every game being designed around what people on forums say, it drives me crazy. It's like what Henry Ford said: "If I asked people what they wanted they would have told me faster horses". I really think jobs like firing mortars, and doing logi runs, should be done by A.I. People on the forum/reddit immediately balk at the suggestion, but at the end of the day actions speak louder than words and no matter what server I'm on people are almost always reluctant to do these jobs. I mean come on, you really do have to be a little bit on the spectrum to enjoy driving a logi all game. I'm not talking about driving it from spawn at the beginning of a game, but rather running it back and forth to supply mortars or rocket artillery all game. You may as well go play euro truck simulator, way better experience. Firing mortars same thing, sitting on your ass looking at a protractor doing quick maffs is not my idea of fun, and the vast majority of people's actions in game says I'm in the right on this one. So for the last time, before you start arguing against my position, remember I wouldn't actually care about this if IN REALITY there were plenty of people willing to do these jobs. I just want to see them done, as it opens up strategic diversity. Unfortunately the reality is, no one wants to do them.
  11. Release: Alpha Version 7.7

    I'm sorry but you are not entitled to a functioning game if you buy into an Alpha. The only reason ANYONE should buy into an Alpha is in the hopes that your money one day leads to the game coming to fruition. There are no guarantees with Early Access titles, end of story. The reason I bought EA SQUAD is because I'm a veteran of the Battlefield series who's completely disappointed with what EA & DICE did to the series, so I'm literally willing to throw money at anyone even attempting to develop a more involved and complex game. Learn some basic economics. Let's face it, there is a massive DEMAND for what SQUAD is trying to offer, and there is zero SUPPLY on the market. SQUAD is barely even a playable game and people are already acting like they're paying customers entitled to some finished product. When it comes to Early Access, you are NOT A CUSTOMER, you are an INVESTOR. Investors don't cry like babies, they are supremely swag gentlemen who boldly put their money behind what they believe to be good people with good ideas.
  12. BTR

    Erm, the Stryker is in a whole other league than the BTR-80. KPVT is an old weapon and only 14.5mm, Stryker has a modern 30mm auto-cannon. The difference between up-armored HMMWV and BTR-80 is big, but nowhere near as big as the difference between the Stryker and BTR-80. So I'm guessing there is meant to be an asymmetric balance between the HMMWV and BTR-80.
  13. Thanks for pointing out how derailed this thread got. I stopped replying because some people started talking about how they wanted no stats at all, which is a discussion that belongs in a completely different thread since it's a fundamental disagreement.
  14. Sure but they need to implement a dynamic reward for flag captures first. Right now you just get a flat 100 points for neutralizing/capping a flag, which for an undefended flag is a way too much IMO.
  15. Flippin' FOBS on Flags!!!

    Generally I agree. Although there are certain flags that you can build FOBs on in certain situations, generally the ones with the bigger compounds. Also you need a good Squad Leader who knows how to place Hesco walls properly, it's very easy to fuck up and accidentally give the enemy a way to climb over.
×