Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About banOkay

  • Rank
    Company Commander

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  1. New Website Launch

    Looks like this in Edge.
  2. Why it is so pixelated?

    The game is an eye strain simulator.
  3. what happened to the sound?

    I have and it works very well. The problem with spending money on this is that everyone has different ears and the solution you're buying might not be good for you. With HeSuVi you can switch between them and the installation takes 10 min anyway.
  4. what happened to the sound?

    Don't waste your money, you can simulate such technologies for free now. https://sourceforge.net/p/hesuvi/wiki/Help/#installation
  5. Try HeSuVi with Equalizer APO to test different virtual surround implementations without actually needing any hardware. Sennheiser GSX is a very popular one and with this software you can get the same thing for free. Sound awareness is very lacking in Squad, regardless of sound card or headphones. The realistic volume design just breaks it and the positioning isn't good anyway. PR had much better sound awareness, even if the samples themselves weren't as high quality.
  6. Battlefield V

    Some of the kits had appropriate guns, but literally from the link you posted yourself above: "The M1911 (just referred as "Colt") is the standard sidearm for all Allied forces. Its portrayal is highly inaccurate, shown as a double-action handgun, and firing from an eight round magazine." "The Lee-Enfield No.4 MK I is the standard weapon for the US Army, British and Russian Engineer classes. A bayonet version is available in the expansion pack Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome for the Allied Engineer classes. The US Army should be using the M1 Garand or M1 Carbine and the Russians should be using a Mosin-Nagant carbine." "The Lee Enfield No.4 Mk.I(T) is the standard weapon for all Allied Scouts. This is highly incorrect, as it should only be available to British and Commonwealth soldiers; it also has a capacity of five rounds, half that of the real rifle. The American Scouts should instead be armed with scoped Springfield M1903 rifles and the Russian scouts should be armed with scoped Mosin-Nagant M91/30 rifles." "The extremely rare Type 5, which never saw service, somehow replaces the equally incorrect Karabiner 98k as the standard weapon for the Japanese Engineer class. While it has the correct 10-round magazine capacity, it also has the very incorrect detachable magazine when it should be non-detachable and loaded with two 5-round Arisaka stripper clips." "The M1918 Browning Automatic Rifle is the standard weapon for American, British, and Free French Assault classes. The Brits should be using the Bren as their main LMG and the French could use the FM 24/29 as they considered it superior to the BAR." "The Panzerschreck is the standard weapon for all Axis Anti-Tank classes. While it's moderately logical for the Germans and Italians to use these weapons in the numbers they do (a better choice would be the Panzerfaust), things take a turn for the surreal when Japanese soldiers wield them during the Battle of Wake Island." My last post about this, Battlefield never had authenticity. Look at any of the reviews too.
  7. Battlefield V

    So basically you want to move the goal post so that 1942 passes it but V doesn't. 1942 had entire armies using weapons not used by that faction at all and completely wrong weapons for classes. If you move the authenticity goal this low then V passes it too - there's nothing in the game that wasn't there in the time period. I wish people just stopped being upset about this, we're getting another Alpha test next week.
  8. Battlefield V

    Really, where was that? That would be a big change from all other Battlefield games.
  9. BFV Closed Alpha

    The gunplay is really good, very little 3D spotting as well, the new mark instead of spot mechanic is great, 2D spotting is just a last-seen dot and doesn't move. But still a lot of rock paper scissors, map design too limited etc. Overall a really big improvement, not sure if it'll be actually enjoyable though, played only for 1h.
  10. Historical accuracy in war games

    Well you were claiming that the idea of no frontline women is now over turned, or at least influenced. There aren't many women in video games overall and there are tons of misrepresentations and inaccuracies all over the place. I feel horrible for seeming to side with EA, but the way I see it is that EA wants money. DLCs failed or cost too much resources to make and they split the community. Nobody cares about subtle weapon skins because you don't really notice them. Gameplay advantages sure give you a reason to buy items, but the community clearly hated that and BF2 flopped. So they got rid of DLCs and ramped up the customization, they don't care if it's WW2 and choices are limited, they want money. That's the way I see it despite the retarded comments from some of the DICE and EA staff.
  11. Historical accuracy in war games

    No it's not, all the facts stay the same because no sane person makes conclusion about history based on a multiplayer portion of an arcade game...
  12. Historical accuracy in war games

    There is no immersion either way because of how unrealistic the gameplay is. Please give me examples of this, which facts did the hundreds of unrealistic WW2 games made before today overturn?
  13. Historical accuracy in war games

    I'm on the side that doesn't see the big deal as these games have never been historically accurate in the first place and offer absolutely no value at describing how the war actually was. We're playing a video game for fun, it was made for profit and somehow people mix in "respect" and "historical accuracy". If you're into history you need to study it instead of playing a video game expecting to get a history lesson, especially an arcade multiplayer one.
  14. Battlefield V

    BF:V came out 14 years ago, times have changed. Battlefield is not immersive, no matter how authentic the setting could be. EA has tried milking more money out of their games for years. DLCs are too much work and split the community, nobody cares about BF1 weapon skins because you hardly ever notice them, BF2 p2w loot crates were a complete failure. EA sees games like Fortnite and PUBG doing well, they decide to drop premium + DLCs and ramp up the customization options.