Jump to content


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Igno

  • Rank
    Platoon Leader

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

626 profile views
  1. V10 - Whats next?

  2. Why aren't you playing Squad?

    Got twins the last summer, in addition too the two kids we already have. I'll play when spare time is a thing again.
  3. Classes you will never see

    Classes, I dont think we will see any classes. But different roles and kits definitely. J/K, I just frem that the word classes belongs in those fantasy games.
  4. How to get better fps?

    Turn off fps indicator. It is just a placebo!
  5. I dont like to use RL as a reference, but look at it from that perspectiv. Most vehicles, especially support vehicles, has a radio inside. So there is a radio in the vehicle and that radio is set to the command/SL-SL channel, and when you enter AS driver, you can listen to and respond om that channel. It probably should not be in every vehicle, but maybe in vehicles that is supporting the team. But I do see your point about cluttering up the comms with more people. @madcat768
  6. I dont think you really understood me. I am talking about giving other squadleaders the ability to communicate directly with the vehicles that are supporting them. And I never said anything about removing squad locking. I am a true believer of dedicated squads, coming from years of playing PR.
  7. Dedicated squads was a given, but maybe my suggestion only works in a perfect world where people have some radio disiplin
  8. Would it be possibly to add a feature that allowed a player that sits in the driver or passenger seat of a vehicle, to get access to the all SL radio channel? Ex 1: You are running a supply/trans squad, and have 2 additional members in your squad who drives their own vehicles. If this feature was in place, they could receive and respond to requests, without you, the SL, having to do all the communicating. Ex 2: An apc squad is covering a group of infantry advancing on an objective. SL's of the different inf squads could then communicate directly with the apc closest to them, to get that fire support quickest. What do you think?
  9. Dedicated Squads

    @Zylfrax791 I think the point they are trying to make, is that vehicle/support squads not necessarily should be locked at 2 people. Because there is usually more than one such vehicle. Also it seems that many of you agree, so I dont see the point og this *** measuring competition you got going on here. lol
  10. Dedicated Squads

    ^^This! Some servers already have some rules in place, and I guess that in time this will be better. And also imo, squad locking should only be for assets squads and other squad types that dont need many players. Normal inf squads should not be locked, also locked "clan" squads is just anti social behaviour and should not take place in public servers.
  11. Alpha 9.6 Feedback

    Servers should have some rules against locking squads, and enforce them properly. Ex. There is no reasons to lock a normal infantry squad, that's just anti social.
  12. Release: Alpha Version 9.6

    I am with you on this one @Tartantyco No supplies, no emplacements. If the squad could do this ones per respawn it would make some sense, after all the soldiers do carry something with them out in the field. But then you could just give them an ammobag or something.
  13. Asset Rules

    Yes PR is good like that. I guess that the Squad community needs time and reasons to naturen. And server rules like this is a step in the right direction.
  14. Asset Rules

    I am all for more server enforcing. Especially when it comes to vehicle claiming and locking squads. Good that someone is starting this, and I hope it will become a trend.
  15. The Dedicated Airsoft Thread

    Some photos from a milsim game I attended a couple months ago